DOJ-OGR-00021553.jpg

20 a1 22 23 24 25 Case 22-1426, Me6eSQmaxl admitted at t wired approxi conspiracy to Document OOK 37 3536039, Page123 of 217 rial showed that accounts under Epstein's name mately $23 million over two occasions during the accounts of "Ghislaine Maxwell." The defendant's assertion tha control over inference tha bearing her n As t the record th townhouse, testimony tha defendant her Para of the Palm B Silence. You' objection. MR. are, your Hon LHE Ov t Epstein's accountant may have had access to and these accounts does not undermine the reasonable t the defendant controlled the funds in accounts ame, so that is established by a preponderance. o the third objection that there's no evidence in at Epstein bought the defendant her New York City I overrule that objection because I credit Kate's t the defendant told her that Epstein bought the New York townhouse. graph 25 is an objection to the characterization each residence being operated through a culture of ll let me know if you're not maintaining an EVERDELL: Yes. I think that the default is we Or. COURT: Understood. errule this objection. Evidence at trial indicates tha manual instru t this was the case. For example, the household cted employees to "see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing." this instruct eredit Mr. Alessi's testimony that he understood ion to be a kind of warning that he was supposed SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.eee (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00021553