DOJ-OGR-00021559.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document ON 383 3536039, Page129 of 217 14 , defendant objects to the assertion that Epstein briefly penetrated Carolyn's vagina with his penis Fense claims is contradicted overrule this objection. Carolyn plainly testified , the defendant again objects to the Again, we'll pick up on that issue when we discuss the appropriate guideline manual. Paragraphs 75 and 76 the defendant objects to the she contends have no bearing on the sentence in this case. M6SOmaxl 1 that for now. 2 Paragraph 72 3 4 because her trial testimony the deft 5 by a 2009 deposition testimony. 6 Again, credit Carolyn's testimony. 7 to this at trial. 8 Paragraph 74 9 assertion as to the age and timing. 10 11 12 inclusion of these paragraphs in the present 13 the perjury counts have not b 14 15 do overrule this objection. 16 largely unlimited as to the kind of 17 consider. It's free 18 dropped counts of an indictment, 19 acquittal in determining sentence. 20 839 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2016). 21 long as the information is reliable and accurate. 22 following reasons, do 23 severed perjury charges is reliable. 24 under oath in 2016 that 25 to recruit underage girls for sexual nce report because n presented to a jury, and so A sentencing court's discretion is information it may criminal] to consider evidence of uncharged crimes, activity resulting in she was not aware of United States v. Bennett, I may consider the information as For the conclude the information underlying the The defendant testified Epstein's scheme massages and other than SOUTHE RN DISTR CT REPORTERS, PeGu 0 (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00021559