DOJ-OGR-00021578.jpg

20 a1 22 23 24 25 Case 22-1426, Document ON A02 3536039, Page148 of 217 Me6eSQmaxl 33 clearer, your Honor, this notion that she was somehow -- Sarah Kellen was an assistant of both Epstein and Maxwell is again belied by the trial record. If you look at Larry Visoski's testimony, which I believe is what the government is relying on there, he originally testified, oh, I think she was an assistant for both. But on cross-examination, he conceded that he really didn't know what her role was, that she was an assistant for and his best recollection was Epstein. And again, just look again at Cimberly Espinosa's testimony who was the actual assistant for Ms. Maxwell, and she Says unequivocally, "I was her assistant. Kellen was Epstein's assistant." So there is no supervising Sarah Kellen. Th fair inference that Ms. Maxwell was inference is exactly the opposite, and it can't provide a basis for that leadership enhancement. THE COURT: All right. Anything further on the enhancements for the government's objection? MS. MOE: Your Honor, to the leadership question, just very briefly with respect just want to direct the Court's attention, we noted this on page 27 of our brief, but the testimony at trial was that Carolyn recalled that even after Sarah Kellen took over calling to schedule massages, Maxwell was still present inside the Palm Beach residence when Carolyn arrived for massage appointn nents. SOUTHERN DISTR CT REPORTERS, P.C.*ee 12) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00021578