DOJ-OGR-00021580.jpg

20 a1 22 23 24 25 Case 22-1426, Document ON A04 3536039, Page150 of 217 Me6eSQmaxl said, but if welcome to. I don't need repetition of MR. EV. ERD ELL: brief. The gov the background Srnime%me. Your Honor, just there is any additional points you want to make, one point. in its papers makes the argument that 393 the arguments in the papers, you're I will be commentary can't be relied upon as authoritative because it is not explanatory or interpretative of what guideline is. considering. this guideline continuing danger to the community the guideline i dangerous sex of It is not That think that is incorrect. can only be applied to o simply a recitation of what Congress is in terpretative of S « fenders. how to interpre The title of the guideline is repeat t what dangerous means. continuously dangerous to the community, the was first sentence or two which talks about how ffenders who represent a what and That explanatory commentary explains It means someone who is not someone who's never been accused of a crime in the 18 plus years since the crime in this case, and has never been accused of re-offending. So I don't agree with that point. This is authoritative guidance from the Sentencing Commission, and the Court should consider it as such. Thank you. THE COURT: Ms. Moe, do you want to respond? MS. MOE: No, your Honor. We rest on our briefing on this issue, but thank you. THE COURT: Thank you. SOUTHE Anything else? RN D STR CT REPORT ERS 12) 805-0300 y Ps€a oo DOJ-OGR-00021580