DOJ-OGR-00021595.jpg

20 a1 22 23 24 25 Case 22-1426, Document ON-AIO 3536039, Page165 of 217 Me6eSQmaxl the table is more than 5, number would be 36. THE COURT: Mr. Everdell? MR. EVERDELL: THE COURT: highest total of MS. TH E CO orl MOE De URT: Under the 2003 manual -- fFense level, Yes, Thank you, as 5 level Yes, your Ho your Honor. Ms. guideline range 188 to 235. S. Nor. increase by 4 And, thus, I presume you agree with that, See. Thank you. Moe. 50 the total The from 32 to 36. And that produces a MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. MR. EVERDELL: We agree with that, THE COURT: Thank you. Mr. Everdell. Preserving your objections, o anything new based on what said? R. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. the government's response was the on your Honor. Same question to you, £ course, but I don't think because added their request to add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, that. groups. we would li TH S. SO E COURT: oral MOE De Understood. Your Honor, Do you want to respond, Ms. thi I know the Court has already ruled on that. think the record is adequate to make them separate of understand the Court has already ruled on ke to preserve that objection. Thank you. oe? UTHE RN D STRICT REPOR 12) 805-0 300 TERS, Fs so we do object to We don't fense that, but CC. eee nk the Court's rulings DOJ-OGR-00021595