DOJ-OGR-00021744.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Page2 of 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .00. ec ceececeeseeeenseeecnsaaeeeesaeeecnsaaeeneaeeeesseeeens ill PRELIMINARY STATEMENT UN REPLY creas soasa ccs sscees momen oman exes sxsmnen oman exc enema | 1 POINT I (Point I in Appellant’s Principal Brief) MS. MAXWELL IS A THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY OF A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT WHICH, BY ITS TERMS, BARRED THE USAO-SDNY FROM PROSECUTING MS. MAXWELL FOR THESE OFFENSES .........cceccccsceeseeeeeeeeseeeaeeeeeeneeenaeenaeenaes 2 A. Ms. Maxwell has Standing to Enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement as a Third-Party Beneficiary... ccccccccccecesnteeeesteeeeesneeees 3 B. | The Co-Conspirators Provision of the Non-Prosecution Agreement Binds the USAO-SDNY and Annabi is not to the COMITALY 00... eeeccccccceceeeceeeesennnaececeeeeeceseeceaaaececeeeeeeeeeeauaeeeeeeseeeeeeeeequaeeeeeees 7 C. The Court’s Failure to Hold a Hearing on the Scope of the Non-Prosecution Agreement iS an Error ........cccccccscceesereeeeesteeeesseeeenees 11 POINT I (Point IV in Appellant’s Principal Brief) THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN CREDITING A JUROR’S PATENTLY DISHONEST TESTIMONY OFFERED TO EXPLAIN FALSE ANSWERS TO MATERIAL QUESTIONS IN VOIR DIRE AND FURTHER ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT HONEST ANSWERS TO THOSE SAME QUESTIONS WOULD HAVE NOT PROVIDED A VALID BASIS TO REMOVE THE JUROR FOR CAUSED... .eccceccceccesseesseeeneecscecaceceaecnaeceaeeeeenereseneeeneesaeenneeenaeess 13 A. — Juror 50 Concealed Material Information in Voir Dire by Giving False Answers on a Juror Questionnaire and Then Lied About it to the Court in a Post-Verdict Hearing ...........cccceeeees 13 B. — Had Juror 50 Disclosed in Voir Dire his Traumatic Experience as a Victim of Child Sex Abuse, the Information Would Have Established a Valid Basis for a Cause Challenge.......... 16 DOJ-OGR-00021744