Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00021790.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 790.1 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 93.9%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 22-1426, Document 101, 03/10/2024, 3614237, Page1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew’s Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 10, 2024 By CM/ECF Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Docket No. 22-1426 Argument date: March 12, 2023 Dear Ms. Wolfe: The Government respectfully submits this letter, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28G), to inform this Court of United States v. Watkins, 940 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2019). In Watkins, this Court explained that the portion of the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142()(1)(E), that required a detention hearing for “any felony .. . that in- volves a minor victim ... .” permits a court to conduct a “conduct-specific inquiry in which the judicial officer may look beyond the elements of the charged offense to con- sider the actual conduct underlying the arrestee’s charged offense.” 940 F.3d at 165, 167. Because that phrase “refers to a ‘minor victim,” it “suggest[s] factual details surrounding the charged conduct.” Jd. at 166. The Court also noted the absence of a textual trigger for the categorical approach like “that has as an element.” Id. at 166 n.70. The Court further explained that its conclusion was reinforced by legislative history, namely, the inclusion of Section 3142(f)(1)(E) in a statute intended to “afford minor victims of crime the greatest degree of protection.” Id. at 166. The Court contrasted Section 3142(f)(1)(E) with another portion of the Act that contains the word “involves” but requires use of the categorical approach, because that text “refers, variously, to a ‘crime, an ‘offense, and a ‘felony,” indicating an em- phasis on the nature of the legal charge rather than “factual details.” Id. (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3182(f)(1) (discussing “a case that involves ...a crime of violence . . .”); see id. at 162-65. DOJ-OGR-00021790

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00021790.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00021790.jpg
File Size 790.1 KB
OCR Confidence 93.9%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,100 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 20:17:13.184202