DOJ-OGR-00002205.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 101 Filed 12/23/20 Page 2 of 2 Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo (“Amodeo I’), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. /d. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Comme ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). As with the redactions to her renewed motion for bail, the proposed redactions here are narrowly tailored to serve substantial interests, including, most importantly, third parties’ personal privacy interests. See Under Seal v. Under Seal, 273 F. Supp. 3d 460, 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). See also Dkt. No. 95. The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits by no later than December 23, 2020. SO ORDERED. MM 0 isto Dated: December 23, 2020 New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge DOJ-OGR-00002205