Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00002259.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 781.6 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.8%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 109 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 COHEN & GRESSER LLP +1 212.957 7600 phone www.cohengresser.com Christian R. Everdell +1 (212) 957-7600 ceverdell@cohengresser.com January 8, 2021 BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse AO Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to respectfully request a 30-day extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure to file our notice of appeal of the Court’s order denying Ms. Maxwell’s renewed motion for bail. (Dkt. 104, 106). Rule 4(b)(4) provides that a district court may, upon a finding of “good cause,” extend the time to file a notice of appeal “for a period not to exceed 30 days.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). In criminal cases, a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed “within 14 days after ... the entry of either the judgment or the order being appealed.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i).. The Court’s order denying Ms. Maxwell’s renewed motion for bail was entered on December 28, 2020. (Dkt. 104, 106). Accordingly, Ms. Maxwell’s notice of appeal of that order must be filed on or before Monday, January 11, 2021. There is good cause for an extension here. Ms. Maxwell is considering whether to submit a third bail application to the Court, which would propose even more stringent and restrictive bail conditions than those proposed in the renewed bail application. The requested extension will give Ms. Maxwell the opportunity to research whether and to what extent these additional conditions are legally and practicably available, without forfeiting as untimely a possible appeal from the Court’s December 28 Order denying the renewed bail application. The additional time is also warranted because it will enable the defense to continue its review of recently produced documents and to file our pretrial motions (each of which may bear on the merits of a possible third bail application); to research whether an appeal of the December 28 Order might deprive this Court of jurisdiction to address a third bail application; and because of logistical challenges posed by the continued effects of the pandemic. DOJ-OGR-00002259

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00002259.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00002259.jpg
File Size 781.6 KB
OCR Confidence 94.8%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,383 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 16:21:49.432160