EFTA00584212.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL DIVISION
CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG
Judge David F. Crow
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants.
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files
this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards
("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges:
INTRODUCTION
This litigation has at its core a law firm that has been described by a United States
Attorney as a criminal enterprise. Its founder, Scott Rothstein — Edwards' partner, is currently
serving a 50-year sentence in federal prison for selling fake settlements to unsuspecting
investors. This $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme was based on the crafting of fake agreements, forged
signatures and a fundamental corruption of the many legal protections that the legal system has
in place. By claiming to be engaged in what is tantamount to legal extortion, the law firm of
Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, P.A ("RRA") defrauded investors, convincing them into
purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious structured settlements, including those
falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA for Edwards' clients with claims against Epstein,
to the detriment of the Plaintiff. Defendants Rothstein, Edwards, and others, conspired to induce
FOWLER WHITE BuRNEET P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584212
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
investors to pay fictitious settlement participations by the prosecution of exaggerated civil claims
against Epstein and in furtherance thereof, made improper use of the judicial system and civil
process by inter alia filing -- but not serving -- a highly-emotionally charged complaint in
federal court, although a state court complaint had been pending on behalf of the same plaintiff
for almost a year, engaging in unreasonable and vexatious discovery and motion practice in
certain underlying actions against Epstein, making unfounded and highly charged sexual
allegations in these underlying actions, and using improper investigatory tools, and causing
damages to Epstein.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1.
This is an action for damages in excess of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00),
exclusive of interest and costs.
2.
Epstein is domiciled in Palm Beach County, Florida.
3.
Rothstein was at all relevant times a resident of Broward County, Florida, and the
chairman, managing partner and chief executive officer of a law firm called Rothstein,
Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), whose main office was in Broward County.
4.
Edwards is a resident of Broward County, Florida, and is licensed to practice law
in the state of Florida.
5.
Beginning in April, 2009, and at all relevant times, Edwards was a partner in
RRA.
The Ponzi Scheme
6.
During 2009 Rothstein pursued a course of criminal conduct which included a
scheme to defraud various investors into purchasing fake interests in assignments of fictitious
structured settlements by showing them complaints filed in the Edwards' cases against Epstein,
- 2 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584213
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
which settlements were falsely claimed to have been reached by RRA on behalf of clients,
including clients who had brought legal actions against the Plaintiff, in exchange for immediate
payments to these clients of a discounted lump sum amount.
7.
The purpose of the investments was to enrich Rothstein, along with other
members of RRA and others, to sustain the daily operations of RRA, and specifically, among
other things, to raise capital to continue to fund investigators which were to be used in the
prosecution of claims against the Plaintiff.
8.
At or near the time that Rothstein and others in his firm, many of whom have pled
guilty to federal crimes, were pursuing this Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation
against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-
80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"),
Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50-
2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Actions").
9.
The lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defendant Edwards.
10.
Beginning in approximately the spring of 2009 through October, 2009, in support
of the massive Ponzi scheme, Rothstein made various representations to potential investors
regarding the Epstein Actions, as well as other alleged claims against Epstein, including, but not
limited to, the following:
(1)
($30,000,000);
That RRA had settled one case for at least Thirty Million Dollars
(2)
That RRA had a team of investigators consisting of former law
enforcement officers, including a former sheriff, who would use this sophisticated eavesdropping
equipment and sift through a potential defendant's garbage looking for damaging evidence that
could be used to benefit RRA clients by enhancing the value of the clients' claims, and thereby
engaging in tactics tantamount to legal extortion;
- 3 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584214
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
(3)
That Rothstein had meetings with Epstein's alleged victims and
their families regarding the structured settlements;
(4)
That these victims would take a lesser settlement if paid promptly
and that investors who funded these early payments would be paid their investment plus a return
when Epstein paid the greater amounts to settle the claims;
(5)
That in addition to the Epstein Actions, many anonymous women
were lined up to settle with Epstein with claims for hundreds of millions of dollars;
(6)
That RRA attorneys would sue Epstein and disclose embarrassing
information about Epstein, his family, friends and associates unless Epstein paid exorbitant
settlements;
(7)
That if the potential investors did not make investments as
promised on a strict timetable, RRA risked being fired and would lose the cases they had against
Epstein to other lawyers; and
(8)
That one of the RRA clients felt that Rothstein had lied to her
repeatedly about funding, and that she was one step away from going to another lawyer and
going to the Florida Bar.
II.
RRA employed a team of investigators on the Epstein Actions, including Michael
Fisten ("Fisten") and former Broward County Sheriff and convicted felon Ken Jenne ("Jenne").
12.
Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards, and
routinely reported to Edwards and Rothstein regarding their investigations of Epstein.
13.
Edwards brought the clients Jane Doe, EW, and LM to RRA when he joined the
firm in April, 2009.
14.
Rothstein approved Edwards incurring costs between $110,000 to $200,000 on
the Epstein Actions, costs paid for as the proceeds of its massive fraud.
15.
In October, 2009, Rothstein directed Edwards' investigative team to bring case
files into a conference room at RRA to be examined by potential investors. Then, Fisten and
Jenne brought in the case files for the Epstein Actions, which numbered as many as nineteen (19)
boxes.
- 4 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584215
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
16.
On or about October 13, 2009, Dean Kretschmar ("Kretschmar"), a representative
of one of the investor groups, was encouraged by Rothstein, in a meeting with other partners of
RRA, to look at the Epstein case files that Fisten and Jenne had stacked around the conference
room.
17.
On or about October 13, 2009, Illinois attorney, Michael Legamaro, and his
client, hedge fund operator Thane Ritchie, were also invited to examine Epstein case files and a
flight log displayed by Rothstein that allegedly contained the names of numerous celebrities who
purportedly flew on Epstein aircraft. Mr. Legamaro and his client reviewed both the flight log
and the case files in the offices of RRA.
18.
The Epstein case files were displayed to potential investors in RRA's office to
show them that the cases against Epstein were legitimate and that the alleged victims actually
existed, all for the purpose of obtaining the investments.
19.
Although Edwards has given sworn deposition testimony that only a few
attorneys employed at RRA were directly involved in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, a
privilege log prepared by Edwards, and other documents, clearly reflect that more than eighteen
(18) RRA lawyers were involved in prosecuting the Epstein Actions. Additionally, four RRA
investigators and several legal assistants and paralegals were involved in the Epstein Actions.
20.
On multiple occasions, and in contrast to Edwards' sworn testimony, many RRA
attorneys conferred and were involved with the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, including as
described below:
a)
On May 3, 2009, Russell Adler ("Adler"), a name partner in RRA, who
took part with Edwards in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, sent an email to the staff and
attorneys in RRA regarding depositions in the Epstein Actions;
- 5 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584216
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
b)
On July 17, 2009, Jenne sent an email to Edwards about the Epstein
Actions;
c)
On July 18, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Adler, stating that "with the
right moves we could force Epstein to settle for a lot of money";
d)
On July 22, 2009, Edwards sent an email to the Attorneys at RRA
requesting a litigation meeting. On July 23, 2009, Priscila Nascimento, one of the secretaries to
Rothstein, was advised of the scheduled meeting;
e)
On July 29, 2009, Cara Holmes, an attorney at RRA working on the
Epstein cases, and a former agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sent an email to
Edwards stating that "our best bet is to go after those close to Epstein";
In July, 2009, Edwards and co-counsel, Paul Cassell, exchanged emails
about their lack of proof on a previously-filed motion, which claimed that Epstein was moving
his assets to avoid paying any judgments that may be obtained by RRA clients against Epstein;
g)
On August 13, 2009 an email was sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik
("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On
that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on
August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research on the causes of
actions against Epstein. On August 14, 2009, Edwards sent an email to RRA attorneys called
litigation strategy regarding Epstein;
h)
On August 17, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Nurik regarding a legal
opinion on the Epstein matter;
- 6 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584217
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
i)
In the month of August, 2009, Edwards, Jenne and Fisten, exchanged
emails on approximately four occasions discussing investigative techniques and other Epstein
matters;
j)
In the month of September, 2009, emails were exchanged between
Edwards and William Berger ("Berger"), a partner at RRA who also participated in the Epstein
actions, regarding Litigation Strategy.
k)
On September 11, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Elizabeth Villar, a legal
assistant to Rothstein, about Epstein's alleged asset transfers; and
I)
On September 4 and again on September 9, 2009, Edwards and Fisten
exchanged emails on Epstein Litigation Strategy.
21.
By August, 2009, Edwards was aware that RRA' s offices were audio monitored
and recorded, including discussions on speakerphone.
22.
Beginning in October, 2009, the level of communications by and between
Edwards and others, including Rothstein, described below, increased dramatically, as Rothstein
was running out of money, and was in search of new victims in order to continue to perpetuate
the Ponzi scheme, and coincided with Rothstein's efforts to get the investments for the Epstein
actions concluded. Those communications include:
a)
From October 5, 2009 to October 18, 2009, emails were sent between
Edwards and Berger, Edwards and Fisten, and Edwards and RRA attorneys regarding Epstein
Litigation Strategy.
b)
On October 19, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Nurik on JEE [Epstein]
Evidence.
- 7 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584218
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
c)
During this same time frame Rothstein was exchanging emails with the
investors for the Epstein cases, telling them that if the investment was not made soon he would
lose the client group to other lawyers.
d)
During this same time frame, specifically on or around October 13, 2009,
Kretschmar and Legamaro of the investor group were shown by Rothstein the actual case files
of RRA in the Epstein Actions. The Epstein files were brought to the conference room by Fisten
and Jenne.
e)
During this same time frame, on or around October 21, 2011, A.J. Discala,
a potential investor in the Epstein matters, sent an email to Rothstein about the private placement
memoranda for the investment.
23.
On October 22, 2009, the following events occurred:
a)
Edwards sent an email to book a conference room for as many attorneys as
possible to attend a meeting on October 23, 2009 on the Epstein Actions. The email requested
that Jenne, Adler, Berger, Barry Stone, Mike Wheeler, Cara Holmes, Rob Buschel, Fisten, Steve
Jaffe, and Nurik attend;
b)
Nurik emailed Edwards about the meeting;
c)
Edwards sent an email to Pat Diaz, another investigator on the Epstein
case, regarding " new developments which require your expertise."
24.
On October 23, 2009, the following events occurred:
a)
Jenne sent an email to Rothstein advising him of an October 23, 2009
meeting;
b)
Rothstein emailed the investors that the Epstein client is going to another
lawyer if the investment is not made right away;
- 8 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584219
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
c)
Rothstein sent an email to Adler regarding causes of action against
Epstein;
d)
Adler sent an email to RRA attorneys on Epstein litigation strategy;
e)
Edwards sent an email to RRA attorneys on Epstein litigation strategy;
f)
Edwards sent an email to RRA attorneys regarding causes of action
against Epstein;
g)
Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding causes of action against
Epstein;
h)
Rothstein sent to Legamaro, counsel for the Investors, an email regarding
the causes of action against Epstein.
Based upon the foregoing, Rothstein received information from Edwards and Adler regarding
causes of action against Epstein, and Rothstein then sent information regarding causes of action
against Epstein to Legamaro, counsel for the Investors for the purpose of obtaining funds for the
Ponzi scheme.
25.
Given the interdependence of so many RRA lawyers, investigators, and other
staff, and the wide communications that necessarily accompanied the involvement of so many
people, Edwards knew, or should have known, that his Epstein case files were being shown and
touted to investors and that he was assisting and aiding Rothstein to close the deal with the
investors, particularly where the magnitude of the potential settlements in the Epstein Actions
was a key selling point.
26.
In October, 2009, Rothstein convinced investors to put up money to realize a
substantial return emanating from the fraudulent settlement of the Epstein cases.
- 9 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584220
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
27.
In November, 2009, RRA collapsed and ultimately went into bankruptcy and
Rothstein voluntarily relinquished his law license and was disbarred by the Florida Supreme
Court.
28.
Subsequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in federal court, pled guilty and
ultimately was sentenced to a 50-year prison sentence for fraud and racketeering, based on an
alleged $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme designed, among other things, to infuse funds into RRA, his
own pockets, and those of his cohorts.
The federal government called RRA a criminal
enterprise.
COUNT I:
ABUSE OF PROCESS - EDWARDS
29.
Plaintiff realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 28
as if they were fully set forth here.
30.
Edwards made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process as follows:
(a)
On September 11, 2008, Edwards filed a state court action on behalf of client
L.M. against Edwards seeking damages. On July 22, 2009, Edwards sent an email to the
Attorneys at RRA requesting a litigation meeting.
(b)
On July 24, 2009, Edwards, on behalf of client L.M., filed a two hundred and
thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV-
81092. However, Edwards was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's
last name so as not to alert the defendant that the case had been filed. Each of the one hundred
and fifty-six counts (156) is a separate cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, which
provides a civil remedy authorizing damages of no less than $150,000 per violation. Thus,
Edwards sought total damages in excess of Twenty-Three Million Four Hundred Thousand
- 10 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584221
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
Dollars ($23,400,000.00). Edwards knew or should have known that highly-charged sexual
allegations in that complaint that Epstein forced L.M. to have "oral sex" with him were false.
Edwards' client confirmed this fact in her deposition, but Edwards never amended the complaint.
(c)
On or about October 13, 2009, Attorney Legamaro and his client, potential
investor, Thane Ritchie, were shown Epstein case files at RRA for the purpose of obtaining
Richie's investment in the Epstein actions. Epstein believes that the federal complaint in L.M. v.
Epstein was shown to Legamaro and Ritchie at that time and that it was prepared by Edwards
with highly-charged sexual allegations solely to be shown to induce investment in the Epstein
Actions and advance the Ponzi scheme, as demonstrated by the fact that Edwards never served
Epstein with a summons and complaint in that federal action, which action was filed long after
Edwards filed and served a state court civil action on behalf of L.M.
31.
On or about October 17, 2009, Edwards, who had filed a state complaint against
Epstein on behalf of E.W., emailed his assistant to file a federal complaint against Epstein on
behalf of E.W like the one he had filed in federal court on behalf of L.M..
32.
Edwards also made illegal, improper and perverted use of the civil process in
order to bolster the case to investors by utilizing it to conduct unreasonable and unnecessary
"discovery," making unfounded allegations, and engaging in improper motion practice, including
but not limited to:
(I)
Deposing three airplane pilots employed by Epstein, and seeking a
deposition of a fourth pilot; collectively, the three were deposed for over twelve hours but were
not asked a single question relating to any of the claims of Edwards' clients. Instead they were
asked many inflammatory questions that had no legitimate legal purpose;
(2)
Noticing and subpoenaing for deposition the following people:
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584222
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
(3)
(a)
(b)
Donald Trump (a real estate investor and television
personality);
Alan Dershowitz (a renowned Harvard Law Professor and one of
Epstein's criminal defense lawyers);
(c)
David Copperfield (illusionist);
(d)
Individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable,
political or other donations.
Taking the deposition of Mark Epstein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not
asking any questions about Edwards' clients;
Edwards targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close to Epstein, not because they
had any connection to, or knowledge of, the claims of Edwards' clients. Edwards' intent was to
harass Epstein's friends, family and acquaintances;
(4)
Asking outrageous questions of the Plaintiff in depositions which had no
legitimate bearing on the cases or the issues to be tried, including questions regarding the size of
his genitalia, whether witnesses would leave their children alone with the Plaintiff;
(5)
Conducting irrelevant and meritless discovery by issuing a subpoena to
obtain records from an alleged sex therapist, Dr. Leonard Baird in Massachusetts, when issues
relating to Epstein's mental and emotional states were not at issue and when Dr. Baird had never
even treated the Plaintiff;
(6)
Directing and filing of Notices for the following health care professionals
to produce medical records of Epstein, when Epstein's mental and emotional state was not an
issue in the case:
(a)
Charles J. Galecki, M.D.;
(b)
Bruce W. Markowitz, M.D.; and
(c)
Steven R. Alexander, Ph.D.;
- 12 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584223
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
(7) Directing and filing Notices to the following banks of Epstein, Colonial Bank
and Palm Beach National Bank, to produce all financial records of Epstein, allegedly for the
purpose of obtaining records of payments by Epstein to the alleged victims, knowing full well
that the alleged victims testified to being paid in cash;
(8)
Directing
and filing of Notices to obtain all records of Epstein's
prescriptions and all other health related documents at two local pharmacies, when no issues of
Epstein's health had been raised in the Epstein Actions;
(9)
Edwards filed motions in the Epstein Actions attempting to plead a cause
of action for RICO when there was no good faith basis for doing so; and
(10)
Edwards filed motions to freeze assets of Epstein without any evidence
that Epstein was attempting to sequester or transfer assets and prior to Edwards obtaining a
judgment against Epstein. Ultimately the federal district court found the " motion was entirely
devoid of evidence of Defendant's [Epstein] alleged transfers".
33.
Edwards had ulterior motives for making these improper uses of civil process
which included, among others:
(1)
maintaining a Ponzi scheme;
(2)
obtaining funds for the continued investigation and prosecution of
the Epstein Actions;
obtaining operating revenue so that RRA could continue to
operate.
34.
As a result of the above, the Plaintiff has suffered damages by incurring additional
and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs to defend these abuses of process.
(3)
- 13 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584224
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against
Defendant Bradley J. Edwards for compensatory damages, interest, costs of this action, and any
other relief deemed appropriate by this Court.
COUNT II: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ABUSE OF PROCESS - ROTHSTEIN
35.
Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1
through 28, and 30 through 32, as if they were fully set forth herein.
36.
Edwards and Rothstein conspired and entered into an express or implied
agreement to engage in the tort of abuse of process as part of a plan to defraud investors and
further the Ponzi scheme. Rothstein knew or should have known of Edwards' efforts to make
illegal, improper, and perverted use of the civil process in order to assist Rothstein in bringing
about the investment.
37.
The actions described in paragraphs 10 through 24 and 30 through 32 constitute
overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy.
38.
As a member of the conspiracy, Rothstein is liable for the acts of Edwards
described herein.
39.
As a result of the conspiracy, Epstein has been damaged by incurring additional
and unnecessary attorney's fees and costs and the cost of installing an enhanced security system
and retention of security personnel for the safety of Epstein and to protect his property.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, demands a trial by jury, a judgment against
the Defendant, Scott Rothstein, for compensatory damages, costs, interest and any and other
relief deemed appropriate by this Court.
- 14 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584225
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly
furnished via
G Email, G Facsimile, G U.S. Mail, G Hand Delivery, G Federal Express this
day of August, 2011:
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
P.O. Drawer 3626
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
Marc S. Nurik, Esq.
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Martin Weinberg, Esq.
Martin G. Weinberg, P.A.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Suffolk, MA 02116
- 15 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584226
Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Second Amended Complaint
Respectfully submitted,
Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr.
Fla. Bar No. 235954
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A.
901 Phillips Point West
777 South Flagler Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Telephone: (561) 802-9044
Facsimile:
(561) 802-9976
WA807431AMECOM85-Second Amended Complaint - 8-17-11-MA.doex
- 16 -
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044
EFTA00584227
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00584212.pdf |
| File Size | 961.3 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 27,995 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T22:50:22.890225 |