Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00002330.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 708.3 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.5%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document126 Filed 01/25/21 Page 10 of 13 Manhattan Division, Mr. Martin found statistically significant underrepresentation using both the comparative disparity and standard deviation analyses. /d. | 67-68, 74-75. To satisfy the third Duren element, a party need only establish that the underrepresentation is due to the systematic exclusion of a cognizable group during the jury selection processes—i.e., that the discrepancy is “inherent in the particular jury-selection process utilized.” Duren, 439 U.S. at 366. Regardless of whether the White Plains qualified jury wheel is compared to the eligible jury population of the Manhattan Division or to that of the entire Southern District of New York, the primary reason for the significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic jurors on the White Plains wheel is the choice to pursue an indictment from a grand jury drawn from the White Plains Division, as opposed to the Manhattan Division or the District as a whole. This decision resulted in the systematic exclusion of eligible jurors residing in the southern counties of this District. Moreover, Mr. Martin’s standard deviation analysis found that regardless of whether the Manhattan Division or the entire District is used as the point of comparison, the percent of both Black and Hispanic jurors in the White Plains jury wheel differs from that in the comparison population by more than three standard deviations. Martin Decl. {fj 74-75. According to Mr. Martin, if there is no systematic overrepresentation or underrepresentation of a distinctive group, the divergence of demographics should exceed three deviations only approximately 0.5% of the time. /d. § 73. Thus, the underrepresentations here are “not the result of random factors, chance, or luck” but “the result of a systematic process that under represents” each group. /d. 74-75. See Jackman, 46 F.3d at 1248 (finding fair cross-section violation due to systematic exclusion of residents from communities with large minority populations). DOJ-OGR-00002330

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00002330.jpg

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00002330.jpg
File Size 708.3 KB
OCR Confidence 94.5%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,058 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 16:22:31.475015