EFTA00610108.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
3
IX THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PALM REACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. 502009CAOSOSOOXXXXXRAG
JEFFREY EFSTEIN.
Plaintiff,
:077 ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY.
i.RADLEY J. EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY,
AND L.N., INDIVIDUALLY,
Defendants.
HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE DAVID CROW
Monday, March 11, 2013
9:05 a.m. - 9:17 a.n.
PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, COURTROOM 9C
205 north Dixie Highway
Wilt Palm Beach, Florida
Stenographically Reported By:
Paola McGuirk, RPR, FPR
Registered Professional Reporter
Florida Professional Reporter
PROCEEDINGS
2
3
THE CLERK: Epstein vs. Rothstein.
4
MR. SCAROLA: Good morning. Jack Scarola on
5
behalf of Bradley Edwards.
6
THE COURT: Give me one second, please.
7
MR. SCAROLA: Absolutely.
8
THE COURT: Okay, what do we have?
9
MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, this is the
10
Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley Edwards. motion to strike
11
untimely objections, and if I may approach the Court.
12
I have a time line that I hope will be of help to
13
Your Honor.
14
THE COURT: Okay.
15
MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, this motion relates
16
to net worth interrogatories propounded after Your
17
Honor permitted the amendment of this complaint to
18
assert a claim for punitive damages. We served
19
discovery relating to Mr. Epstein's financial
20
circumstances on December 21, '12 following that
21
order, and pursuant to the provision of Rule 1.340
22
and the 1.350 responses to both of those, discovery
23
requests were due within 30 days.
24
Within 30 days rather than filing responses,
25
what we received was a motion for protective order.
2
APPEARANCES:
On behalf of the Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN. P.A.
BY: TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN. ESQUIRE
On behalf of the Defendants:
SEARCY. DENNEY. SCAROLA. BARNHART & SHIPLEY. PA.
9
10
BY: JACK SCAROLA. ESQUIRE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
The motion for protective order raised a variety of
2
objections to the discovery. Included among those
3
objections was that the discovery was propounded for
4
purposes of harassment, oppression and embarrassment.
5
Your Honor considered that motion and entered an
6
order on January 29th denying the motion for
7
protective order. That particular order included no
8
time for the provision of the discovery, and we
9
brought that matter -- that is I. on behalf of
1 0
Mr. Edwards. brought that matter to the Court's
11
attention, and Your Honor entered an order on
12
February 4th compelling responses to the discovery
13
within 20 days.
14
Within 20 days. mther than receiving discovery
15
responses. what we received front the opposing party
16
were more objections. In fact, there is nothing but
17
objections to the discovery. and there is not --
8
apart from Mr. Epstein's name -- there is not a
19
single substantive response to any of the questions
0
that were asked with regard to his financial
1
circumstances.
2 2
It is our position that all of the objections
2 3
that were raised after the initial 30 days for filing
4
of objections or responses to the interrogatories are
2 5
untimely. and that those objections need not be
4
1 (Pages 1 to 4)
EFTA00610108
5
7
1
addressed substantively.
1
is raising a motion for protective order because, and
2
We are not before Your Honor this morning to
2
I quote. This follows from the fact that
3
ask the Court to consider the substance of the
3
Rule 1.280(c) refers to issuance of protective order
4
objections. but to strike all objections, except for
4
only to protect a party or person from annoyance.
5
the Fifth Amendment privilege assertion, on the basis
5
embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or
6
that those objections are untimely. The significance
6
expense." It does not refer to privilege.
7
of striking all of the objections. other than the
7
We think the omission was intentional and.
8
Fifth Amendment privilege objection, is that other
8
therefore, the word objectionable in Rule 1.380(d),
9
objections cannot be commented upon in the presence
9
therefore, should be construed as referring only to
10
of the jury. If there are valid legal objections to
10
items which are within the scope of discovery; that
11
not providing the information. obviously we cannot
11
is. not privileged.
12
draw adverse inferences from those other objections,
12
As such, Judge. once you denied our motion for
13
nor can we comment upon those other objections.
13
protective order, we were still well within ow legal
14
However, the Defendant's failure to respond to
14
rights -- our client's legal rights -- to raise any
15
this financial discovery on the basis of the Fifth
15
objections that were not raised in the motion for
16
Amendment privilege assertion is obviously something
16
protective order. This case supports that position.
17
that can be raised in the presence of the jury. and
17
We timely filed our objection.
18
we can draw adverse inferences from his refusal to
18
THE COURT: As I understand it. he is not
19
provide any financial information whatsoever. That's
19
asking me to rule on privilege objections.
20
the purpose of this motion.
20
MS. COLEMAN: Those are all the objections.
21
THE COURT: Yes.
21
There are various --
22
MS. COLEMAN: Good morning, Judge. Tonja
22
THE COURT: You got overbroad. burdensome, not
23
Haddad Coleman on behalf of Mr. Epstein. First, I'm
23
calculated to lead to admissible evidence.
24
really not quite sure how to respond to this since
24
MS. COLEMAN: Judge. I don't know because he
25
Mr. Scarola has yet, again, filed a motion that
25
didn't provide, as one does, the copies of the
6
8
1
contains not one rule or case on which he's relying.
1
answers to which he is objecting. He's asking you to
2
So. I'll address each allegation in turn.
2
strike all of them. I don't know which ones he wants
3
First, all he states is that our objections are
3
stricken. We raised the privileges.
4
untimely. This Court ordered that we respond. Not
4
THE COURT: Okay. I'm just listening to what
5
answer, but respond to the discovery requests within
5
he said. He said he wants me to strike everything
6
20 days of the order. The order was entered
6
except the privilege objections.
7
February 4th. As such, our response was due on or
7
MS. COLEMAN: Well, they're not here. The
8
before Monday. February 25th. since February 24th was
8
rules -- my understanding of the rules --
9
a Sunday. We timely responded to all discovery
9
THE COURT: Excuse me. What's not here? I'm
10
requests on Friday. February 22nd. actually. making
10
sorry.
11
them early.
11
MS. COLEMAN: The discovery. There's no copy
12
Furthermore. with respect to the motion for
12
of the request in the objections. He wants you to
13
protective order. the law is very clear that the
13
strike everything. What is everything?
14
issues that you must raise in a protective order, and
14
THE COURT: He just gave me a copy of it here.
15
the only issues we raised in our motion for
15
MS. COLEMAN: Well, he didn't give me a copy.
16
protective order were on the grounds of annoyance.
16
THE COURT: Well. it's your responses.
17
embarrassment. oppression. undue burden. We've only
17
MS. COLEMAN: I know it's my responses. Judge.
18
raised issues as delineated in Rule 1.380.
18
It wasn't attached to his motion, and it wasn't
19
However, within our responses to the discovery
19
provided to us.
20
we did raise many objections. including privilege.
20
THE COURT: Okay.
21
and I have a case right on point for the Court, and
21
MS. COLEMAN: His motion doesn't say anything.
22
which I've taken the time to actually highlight the
22
THE COURT: For example. the first one says
23
relevant portions, if I may approach. I have a
23
please produce financial statements to any lender
24
Fourth DCA case in which it says. "A timely objection
24
within the past five years. You have your privilege
25
is not required to claims to be privileged when one
25
objection. and then you say vague. unartfully
2 (Pages 5 to 8)
EFTA00610109
9
11
1
drafted, unable to file a response. I don't know how
1
will have to look at it today. By the way. is your
2
it would be work product. The accountant privilege
2
father an attorney, or is that your brother that's an
3
would not be applicable. So your position is that
3
attorney?
4
you have not waived any -- certainly not waived any
4
MS. COLEMAN: Me?
5
privilege objections. I understand that. Your claim
5
THE COURT: Yeah. Haddad.
6
is that you have not waived any objections?
6
MS. COLEMAN: Yes.
7
MS. COLEMAN: Yes. Your Honor. we never raised
7
THE COURT: Are you related?
8
any issue of overly burdensome. We raised the three
8
MS. COLEMAN: I'm related to a lot of
9
grounds one can raise in a protective order. We did
9
attorneys. I don't know which Haddad you're
10
not raise, in our objection to his discovery
10
referring.
11
requests. any grounds that you had already ruled upon
11
THE COURT: No, I'm sorry. I --
12
in your motion for protective order. As such.
12
MR. SCAROLA: Mr. Haddad has actually entered
13
they're timely objections.
13
an appearance in this case, Your Honor.
14
THE COURT: I honestly don't remember what I
14
THE COURT: Is he related to you?
15
ruled or didn't role.
15
MS. COLEMAN: Yes, he is.
16
MS. COLEMAN: I have a copy of your order right
16
THE COURT: Oh. okay. I just wondered. It's
17
here. It's attached to our response to his motion.
17
interesting. Do you have a relative that works in
18
THE COURT: It says -- you've got here
18
the Court? We have a clerk an attorney.
19
overbroad.
19
THE CLERK: Monica.
20
MR. SCAROLA: Would Your Honor like a copy of
20
THE COURT: Monica Haddad. Is she related?
21
the order?
21
MS. COLEMAN: No.
22
THE COURT: Yes. I don't have the motions. so
22
THE COURT: Because that's not unusual. I
23
I don't know what you raised in the motions, but.
23
mean, it's kind of like a Smith. Jones kind of --
24
okay. yes. sir, you want to respond?
24
MS. COLEMAN: Which is why for the last decade
25
MR. SCAROLA: I would like to respond. Your
25
I've tried using my married name, but it doesn't seem
10
12
1
Honor. The Fourth DCA case, which opposing counsel
1
to take.
2
handed me when she handed it to the Court.
2
THE COURT: Okay. I don't mean to — you know.
3
specifically addresses attorney/client privilege, and
3
I was just interested because it's a --
4
says that attorney/client privilege objections are
4
MS. COLEMAN: Yes.
5
not waived as a consequence of having raised a motion
5
THE COURT: Okay. thank you.
6
for protective order. The motion expressly states
6
MR. SCAROLA: Thank you very much. Your Honor.
7
that we are not seeking this Court's ruling on the
7
THE COURT: And did I see something come back
8
assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege. We are
8
from the Fourth? Y'all filed something against me.
9
seeking to strike all other objections as untimely.
9
right?
10
and it seems strange that the law would develop m a
10
MR. SCAROLA: Yes. they filed a petition for
11
point where no objection is raised substantively.
11
writ of certiorari challenging Your Honor's granting
12
With regard to these requests for financial
12
of leave to amend to assert a claim for punitive
13
information, a motion for protective order is filed.
13
damages.
14
It raises substantial grounds. including harassing.
14
THE COURT: Well. I thought there was something
15
oppressive. embarrassing. and, as counsel has said in
15
like somebody tried to recuse -- not recuse — in
16
her argument. overbroad. and then serially permit
16
fact, the reason I thought it was because I saw it
17
other objections to be raised far after the 30-day
17
come through. Mr. Haddad. somebody tried to get hint
18
deadline for response has passed.
18
kicked off the case. Didn't the Appellate Court say
19
We would ask the Court to grant this motion.
19
I actually did it right? Ant I wrong?
20
strike all objections. except those as to privilege.
20
MS. COLEMAN: Yes, we didn't appeal that.
21
and with regard to any privilege objection. other
21
Judge. because —
22
than attorney/client privilege, we will raise that by
22
MR. SCAROLA: That was not appealed.
23
separate motion.
23
THE COURT: Oh, okay.
24
THE COURT: Okay. I'm going to have to take a
24
MR. SCAROLA: No. the issue that was appealed
25
look at this. The responses are 17 pages long, and I
2 5
was the propriety of Your Honor's order granting
3 (Pages 9 to 12)
EFTA00610110
13
1
leave to assert a claim for punitive damages. The
2
petition for writ of coition was denied as to that
3
matter.
4
THE COURT: Okay.
5
MR. SCAROLA: There was a recent opinion that
6
related to an effort to recuse Attorney Keitel that
7
was just addressed by the Fourth DCA in another
8
matter, so that may have been what Your Honor was
9
seeing.
10
THE COURT: Okay. thank you. guys.
11
MR. SCAROLA: Thank you. Your Honor.
12
MS. COLEMAN: Thank you. Judge.
13
(The hearing concluded at 9:16 a.m.)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
14
1
CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
2
. . .
3
I, Paula McGuirk, Registered Professional
4
Reporter. Florida Professional Reporter, certify that I
5
was authorized to and did stenographically report the
6
foregoing proceedings and that the transcript, pages 1
7
through 13. is a true and complete record of my
8
stenographic notes.
9
10
Dated this 13th day of March. 2013.
11
12
13
14
15
16
Paula M
17
Registered Professional Reporter
Florida Professional Reporter
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4 (Pages 13 to 14)
EFTA00610111
Page 1
A
Absolutely 3:7
accountant 9:2
address 6:2
addressed 5:1 13:7
addresses 10:3
admissible 7:23
adverse 5:12,18
allegation 6:2
amend 12:12
amendment 3:17 5:5,8
5:16 10:8
annoyance 6:16 7:4
answer 6:5
answers 8:1
apart 4:18
appeal 12:20
appealed 12:22,24
appearance 11:13
APPEARANCES 2:1
Appellate 12:18
applicable 9:3
approach 3: I I 6:23
argument 10:16
asked 4:20
asking 7:19 8:1
assert 3:18 12:12 13:1
assertion 5:5,16 10:8
attached 8:18 9:17
attention 4:11
attorney 11:2,3,18 13:6
attorneys 11:9
attorney/client 10:3,4
10:22
authorized 14:5
a.m 1:16,16 13:13
B
back 12:7
BARNHART 2:8
basis 5:5,15
Beach 1:1,17,18 2:8,9
behalf 2:2,7 3:5 4:9
5:23
Boulevard 2:8
Bradley 1:8 3:5,10
brother 11:2
brought 4:9,10
burden 6:17 7:5
burdensome 7:22 9:8
C
calculated 7:23
case 1:2 6:1,21,24 7:16
10:1 11:13 12:18
certainly 9:4
CERTIFICATE 14:1
certify 14:4
certiorari 12:11
certiori 13:2
challenging 12:11
CIRCUIT 1:1,1
circumstances 3:20
4:21
claim 3:18 9:5 12:12
13:1
claims 6:25
clear 6:13
clerk 3:3 11:18,19
client's 7:14
Coleman 2:3,6 5:22,23
7:20,24 8:7,11,15,17
8:21 9:7,16 11:4,6,8
11:15,21,24 12:4,20
13:12
come 12:7,17
comment 5:13
commented 5:9
compelling 4:12
complaint 3:17
complete 14:7
concluded 13:13
consequence 10:5
consider 5:3
considered 4:5
construed 7:9
contains 6:1
copies 7:25
copy 8:11,14,15 9:16,20
counsel 10:1,15
Counter-Plaintiff 3:10
COUNTY 1.1,17
Court 1:1 3:6,8,11,14
5:3,21 6:4,21 7:18,22
8:4,9,14,16,20,22 9:14
9:18,22 10:2,19,24
11:5,7,11,14,16,18,20
11:22 12:2,5,7,14,18
12:23 13:4,10
COURTHOUSE 1:17
COURTROOM 1:17
Court's 4:10 10:7
CROW 1:13
D
damages 3:18 12:13
13:1
Dated 14:10
DAVID 1:13
day 14:10
days 3:23,24 4:13,14,23
6:6
DCA 6:24 10:1 13:7
deadline 10:18
decade 11:24
December 3:20
Defendants 1:9 2:7
Defendant's 5:14
delineated 6:18
denied 7:12 13:2
DENNEY 2:8
denying 4:6
develop 10:10
discovery 3:19,22 4:2,3
4:8,12,14,17 5:15 6:5
6:9,19 7:10 8:11 9:10
Dixie 1:17
drafted 9:1
draw 5:12,18
due 3:23 6:7
E
early 6:11
Edwards 1:8 3:5,10
4:10
effort 13:6
embarrassing 10:15
embarrassment 4:4
6:17 7:5
entered 4:5,11 6:6
11.12
Epstein 1:4 3:3 5:23
Epstein's 3:19 4:18
ESQUIRE 2:6,10
evidence 7:23
example 8:22
Excuse 8:9
expense 7:6
expressly 10:6
F
fact 4:16 7:2 12:16
failure 5:14
far 10:17
father 11:2
February 4:12 6:7,8,8
6:10
FIFTEENTH 1:1
Fifth 5:5,8,15 10:8
file 9:1
filed 5:25 7:17 10:13
12:8,10
filing 3:24 4:23
financial 3:19 4:20 5:15
5:19 8:23 10:12
first 5:23 6:3 8:22
five 8:24
Florida 1:1,18,25 2:4,9
14:4,17
following 3:20
follows 7:2
foregoing 14:6
Fort 2:4
Fourth 6:24 10:1 12:8
13:7
FPR 1:23
Friday 6:10
Furthermore 6:12
G
give 3:6 8:15
going 10:24
Good 3:4 5:22
grant 10:19
granting 12:11,25
grounds 6:16 9:9,11
10:14
guys 13:10
H
Haddad 2:3,6 5:23 11:5
11:9,12,20 12:17
handed 10:2,2
harassing 10:14
harassment 4:4
hearing 1:13 13:13
help 3:12
highlight 6:22
Highway 1:17
honestly 9:14
EFTA00610112
Page 2
Honor 3:9,13,15,17 4:5
4:11 5:2 9:7,20 10:1
11:13 12:6 13:8,11
HONORABLE 1:13
Honor's 12:11,25
hope 3:12
I
included 4:2,7
including 6:20 10:14
INDIVIDUALLY 1:7,8
1:8
inferences 5:12,18
information 5:11,19
10:13
initial 4:23
intentional 7:7
interested 12:3
interesting 11:17
interrogatories 3:16
4:24
issuance 7:3
issue 9:8 12:24
issues 6:14,15,18
items 7:10
J
J 1:8
Jack 2:10 3:4
January 4:6
JEFFREY 1:4
Jones 11:23
2:10
Judge 5:22 7:12,24
8:17 12:21 13:12
JUDICIAL 1:1
jury 5:10,17
K
Keitel 13:6
kicked 12:18
kind 11:23,23
know 7:24 8:2,17 9:1
9:23 11:9 12:2
L
Lakes 2:8
Lauderdale 2:4
law 2:3 6:13 10:10
lead 7:23
leave 12:12 13:1
legal 5:10 7:13,14
lender 8:23
line 3:12
listening 8:4
long 10:25
look 10:25 11:1
lot 11:8
L.M 1:8
making 6:10
March 1:15 14:10
married 11:25
matter 4:9,10 13:3,8
McGuirk 1:23 14:3,16
mean 11:23 12:2
Monday 1:15 6:8
Monica 11:19,20
morning 3:4 5:2,22
motion 3:10,15,25 4:1,5
4:6 5:20,25 6:12,15
7:1,12,15 8:18,21
9:12,17 10:5,6,13,19
10:23
motions 9:22,23
N
name 4:18 11:25
need 4:25
net 3:16
never 9:7
North 1:17
notes 14:8
0
objecting 8:1
objection 5:8 6:24 7:17
8:25 9:10 10:11,21
objectionable 7:8
objections 3:11 4:2,3
4:16,17,22,24,25 5:4,4
5:6,7,9,10,12,13 6:3
6:20 7:15,19,20 8:6
8:12 9:5,6,13 10:4,9
10:17,20
obviously 5:11,16
OFFICES 2:3
Oh 11:16 12:23
okay 3:8,14 8:4,20 9:24
10:24 11:16 12:2,5,23
13:4,10
omission 7:7
once 7:12
ones 8:2
opinion 13:5
opposing 4:15 10:1
oppression 4:4 6:17 7:5
oppressive 10:15
order 3:21,25 4:1,6,7,7
4:11 6:6,6,13,14,16
7:1,3,13,16 9:9,12,16
9:21 10:6,13 12:25
ordered 6:4
overbroad 7:22 9:19
10:16
overly 9:8
P
pages 10:25 14:6
Palm 1:1,17,18 2:8,9
particular 4:7
party 4:15 7:4
passed 10:18
Paula 1:23 14:3,16
permit 10:16
permitted 3:17
person 7:4
petition 12:10 13:2
Plaintiff 1:5 2:2
please 3:6 8:23
point 6:21 10:11
portions 6:23
position 4:22 7:16 9:3
presence 5:9,17
privilege 5:5,8,16 6:20
7:6,19 8:6,24 9:2,5
10:3,4,8,20,21,22
privileged 6:25 7:11
privileges 8:3
proceedings 3:1 14:6
produce 8:23
product 9:2
Professional 1:24,25
14:3,4,17,17
propounded 3:16 4:3
propriety 12:25
protect 7:4
protective 3:25 4:1,7
6:13,14,16 7:1,3,13,16
9:9,12 10:6,13
provide 5:19 7:25
provided 8:19
providing 5:11
provision 3:21 4:8
punitive 3:18 12:12
13:1
purpose 5:20
purposes 4:4
pursuant 3:21
P.A 2:3,8
questions 4:19
quite 5:24
quote 7:2
R
raise 6:14,20 7:14 9:9
9:10 10:22
raised 4:1,23 5:17 6:15
6:18 7:15 8:3 9:7,8,23
10:5,11,17
raises 10:14
raising 7:1
really 5:24
reason 12:16
received 3:25 4:15
receiving 4:14
record 14:7
recuse 12:15,15 13:6
refer 7:6
referring 7:9 11:10
refers 7:3
refusal 5:18
regard 4:20 10:12,21
Registered 1:24 14:3,17
related 11:7,8,14,20
13:6
relates 3:15
relating 3:19
relative 11:17
relevant 6:23
relying 6:1
remember 9:14
report 14:5
Reported 1:22
Reporter 1:24,25 14:1
14:4,4,17,17
EFTA00610113
Page 3
request 8:12
requests 3:23 6:5,10
9:11 10:12
required 6:25
respect 6:12
respond 5:14,24 6:4,5
9:24,25
responded 6:9
response 4:19 6:7 9:1
9:17 10:18
responses 3:22,24 4:12
4:15,24 6:19 8:16,17
10:25
right 6:21 9:16 12:9,19
rights 7:14,14
Rothstein 1:7 3:3
RPR 1:23
rule 3:21 6:1,18 7:3,8
7:19 9:15
ruled 9:11,15
rules 8:8,8
ruling 10:7
S
saw 12:16
says 6:24 8:22 9:18
10:4
Scarola 2:8,10 3:4,4,7,9
3:15 5:25 9:20,25
11:12 12:6,10,22,24
13:5,11
scope 7:10
SCOTT 1:7
SEARCY 2:8
second 3:6
see 12:7
seeing 13:9
seeking 10:7,9
separate 10:23
serially 10:16
served 3:18
Seventh 2:3
SHIPLEY 2:8
significance 5:6
single 4:19
sir 9:24
Smith 11:23
somebody 12:15,17
sorry 8:10 11:11
Southeast 2:3
specifically 10:3
statements 8:23
states 6:3 10:6
stenographic 14:8
stenographically 1:22
14:5
strange 10:10
Street 2:3
stricken 8:3
strike 3:10 5:4 8:2,5,13
10:9.20
striking 5:7
substance 5:3
substantial 10:14
substantive 4:19
substantively 5:1 10:11
Suites 2:4
Sunday 6:9
supports 7:16
sure 5:24
T
take 10:24 12:1
taken 6:22
thank 12:5,6 13:10,11
13:12
think 7:7
thought 12:14,16
three 9:8
time 3:12 4:8 6:22
timely 6:9,24 7:17 9:13
today 11:1
Tonja 2:3,6 5:22
tonja@tonjahaddad....
2:5
transcript 14:6
tried 11:25 12:15,17
true 14:7
turn 6:2
U
unable 9:1
unartfully 8:25
understand 7:18 9:5
understanding 8:8
undue 6:17 7:5
untimely 3:11 4:25 5:6
6:4 10:9
unusual 11:22
V
vague 8:25
valid 5:10
variety 4:1
various 7:21
vs 1:6 3:3
W
waived 9:4,4,6 10:5
want 9:24
wants 8:2,5,12
wasn't 8:18,18
way 11:1
West 1:18 2:9
We've 6:17
whatsoever 5:19
wondered 11:16
word 7:8
work 9:2
works 11:17
worth 3:16
writ 12:11 13:2
wrong 12:19
Yeah 11:5
years 8:24
Y'all 12:8
1
1 14:6
1.280(c) 7:3
1.340 3:21
1.350 3:22
1.380 6:18
1.380(d) 7:8
11 1:15
12 3:20
13 14:7
13th 14:10
17 10:25
2
20 4:13,14 6:6
2013 1:15 14:10
205 1:17
213:20
2139 2:8
22nd 6:10
24th 6:8
25th 6:8
29th 4:6
3
30 3:23,24 4:23
30-day 10:17
3012:4
315 2:3
33301 2:4
33409 2:9
4
4th 4:12 6:7
5
502009CA040800XX...
1:2
9
9C 1:17
9:05 1:16
9:16 13:13
9:17 1:16
2:9
EFTA00610114
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00610108.pdf |
| File Size | 619.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 22,269 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T23:04:11.362269 |