EFTA00611842.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
Alex Gerasev
Bounded Tradable Processes
EFTA00611842
Confidentiality
Information in this presentation is strictly
private & confidential
EFTA00611843
Background
Strategy live at Buttonwood Group Trading (BGT)
07/2011-10/2012 (16 months); back-tested from
01/2006 with similar performance results
Founder of Quanterra Advisors LLC and developer of
quantitative trading strategies since 06/2010
Project Manager / Subject Matter Expert, Global
Banking & Markets at RBS and ABN AMRO 2001-2010
M.Sc. in Financial Mathematics, University of Chicago
B.Sc. in Physics & IT, Novosibirsk State University
Research at VEPP-4 electron-positron collider of
Novosibirsk Institute of Nuclear Physics (11 GeV
energy range)
EFTA00611844
Live Track Record
Buttonwood Group Trading, 07/2011 — 10/2012
EFTA00611845
Live Track Record BG
Date range
07/2011 —10/2012 (16 months)
Reserved capital
Average utilized capital (AUC)
Available leverage
Reinvestment of gains into the strategy
No
Asset classes
3.5m
1.4m
15x
Equities (85%); futures (15%)
o.97m (67.5% return on AUC)
Positive months
Negative months
Best month
Worst month
Sharpe ratio
13 (81%)
3 (19%)
o.27m
-0.07M
2.67
EFTA00611846
Live Track Record - BGT
Monthly Net PnL
300,000.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
-50,000.00
-100,000.00
list
2011-07 2011-08 2011-09 2011-10 2011-11 203.1-12 2012-01 2012-02
2012-04 is
2012-06 2012-07 2012-08 2012-09 2012-10
EFTA00611847
Live Track Record BGT
Cumulative Net Return on AUC
80.00%
70.00%
6o.00%
5o.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
o.00%
2011-07 2011-08 2011-09 2011-10 2011-11 2011-12 2012-01 2012.02 2012.03 2012-04 2012-05 2012.06 2012.07 2012-08 2012-09 2012-10
EFTA00611848
Live Track Record — BGT
Comments:
Reinvestment of strategy gains back into the
strategy would have resulted in significant
performance improvement due to compounding
(total return on AUC 89.9% vs. 67.5%)
Strategy performance was negatively impacted
on at least 3 occasions by emergency re-allocation
of capital to other traders
EFTA00611849
Back-Testing Track Record
01/2006 —12/2012 (84 months)
EFTA00611850
Back-Testing Track Record
Date range
01/2006 - 12/2012 (84 months)
Reserved capital
Average utilized capital (AUC)
Available leverage
Reinvestment of gains into the strategy
No
Asset classes
1.0M
0.62M
15X
Same as live trading
Positive months
Negative months
Best month
Worst month
Sharpe ratio
70 (83%)
14 (17%)
0.42M
-0.17M
3.12
EFTA00611851
Back-Testing Track Record
Observations:
Slightly better performance vs. live performance
during 07/2011 —10/2012 period (no capital re-
allocation issues as mentioned above)
Slightly better overall performance (higher
average volatility)
Market volatility results in better performance;
best years for the strategy were 2008 and 2009
EFTA00611852
Strategy Description
Bounded Tradable Processes
EFTA00611853
Strategy Description: Bounded
Tradable Processes
"Process" can be
single financial instrument (stock, future, option, FX, etc.)
two-legged spread S = X— aY, where X and Y are financial
instruments (stocks, futures, options, FX, etc.)
three-legged spread S = X — aY— bZ, where X, Y, Z are
financial instruments
complex combination spreads e.g. S = aX/Y, S=aX —6Y/gZ,
etc.
"Tradable" means that all components of S can be
traded at any time in required quantities (given
liquidity constraints and other technicalities)
EFTA00611854
Arbitrage Bounds
Tradable Process that has lower, upper, or both lower
and upper arbitrage bounds can be unwound at a pre-
determined price
Various "mechanics" enforcing bounds
Asset swap ("fungibility"): X may be swapped for Y at
holder's discretion — ensures that X > Y; if X < Y, buy bunch
of X, swap for Y and sell Yfor higher price and riskless
profit ("pure" arbitrage)
Multi-step asset swap: similar to above, but involving
multiple steps to unwind complex spread at pre-
determined price
"Hard" bounds — guaranteed to be able to unwind the
process at a known price
EFTA00611855
Non-Arbitrage Bounds
Process should not go beyond certain values due to
fundamentals; however there is no way to unwind if it
does
Example: "asset quality"
Equity with voting rights vs. equity without voting rights
Higher-grade commodity vs. lower-grade commodity
Senior vs. subordinated debt
Once the process moves beyond the bound and
information spreads through the market, the relationship
would typically get restored as participants buy superior
asset for less, or holders of inferior asset replace it with
superior asset while booking a profit
More dangerous than arbitrage bounds — reflect in
position sizing (e.g. io% of arbitrage-bounded trade)
EFTA00611856
Example: Arbitrage Bounded
Process ("hard" bound at zero)
EFTA00611857
Example: Non-Arbitrage Bounded
Process ("soft" bound at zero)
EFTA00611858
Approach to Trading
The closer the process gets to its bound, the
bigger the position with l00% of target
position size right at the bound
As the process moves away from the bound,
reduce position size
As the process oscillates we generate PnL
buy buying lower and selling higher
The schedule of process values and
corresponding position sizes is known as
loading curve
EFTA00611859
Loading Curve Example
00
1
10
40
70
30 7
10 7
20
•
•
I0
12
le
10
EFTA00611860
Profitability Analysis
Volatility is good!
Great opportunities when position can be
entered or increased close to the bound and
unwound as the process moves away
Worst-case scenario: process approaching its
bound with very low volatility and staying at
the bound for prolonged period of time
EFTA00611861
Other PnL Contributors
■ Market making
• Intraday fluctuations
▪ Capturing market impact
Mean-reversion
EFTA00611862
Loading Curve Optimization
Goal: create a loading curve shape that would
maximize PnL
minimize drawdowns
minimize PnL volatility
maximize Sharpe ratio
other considerations
Highly computationally-intensive
optimization techniques based on historical
data
EFTA00611863
Competitive Advantage
Space not nearly as crowded as pure
arbitrage trades
Requires significant R&D efforts that further
reduce competition
Unique and highly computationally intensive
process of model calibration and
optimization
EFTA00611864
Capacity and Scalability
EFTA00611865
Existing Product Groups
14 product groups (tradable processes) are
fully set up and are available for trading
Estimated capacity without adverse impact
on performance: up to io —15m
Further scalability with some performance
impact: up to 20-25m
EFTA00611866
Adding New Product Groups
New product groups (tradable processes)
may be added
Approximately 2 months of R&D per product
group
Many interesting opportunities in
international markets
EFTA00611867
Expanding Across Asset Classes
Same quantitative research methods may be
applied to other asset classes and across asset
classes
Virtually unlimited scalability
Some ideas:
Commodity calendar spreads or spread options +
physical storage
Inter-commodity spreads + physical asset (refinery,
power plant)
Convertible debt
Debt + CDS
EFTA00611868
Summary
EFTA00611869
Summary
Time-tested strategy with excellent
performance characteristics
Market-neutral with no correlation with the S&P
500
Highly scalable
Diversified portfolio of trades already live
Robust quant research framework
Large search universe for adding new product
groups
Further scalability by expanding across asset
classes
EFTA00611870
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00611842.pdf |
| File Size | 1136.9 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 7,646 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T23:04:37.241033 |