Back to Results

EFTA00617213.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 144.0 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AIIILIATID PARTNCRSHIPS Jay P. Lefkowitz, To Call Writer Directly: 212 ...4 r.. 6.4 VIA FACSIMILE (305) 530-6444 Honorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Dear Alex: Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 (212) 446-4800 December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Facsimile: (212) 446.4900 I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our position on two issues: (1) our view on your latest proposal regarding notification to the alleged victims under 18 U.S.C. § 3771; and (2) our response to your proposed language regarding the 18 U.S.C. § 2255 component of the deferred-prosecution agreement (the "Agreement"). Before I turn to these questions, I would like to reiterate that this letter responds to your invitation to discuss proposed modifications to the Agreement and should not be construed in any way as a breach of the Agreement. With that said, I must tell you that the more I look into these issues, the more difficulties I see in trying to tie the resolution of a federal criminal matter with a federal civil matter involving minors, and this is even further complicated when the premise of the resolution is a deferred federal prosecution conditioned on a plea to specific state offenses with a specific sentence pre- determined and required to be imposed by the state court, without consideration of the fact that the State view of this case differs dramatically from yours. With that in mind, I turn to each of your questions below. First, although we appreciate your willingness to modify your Office's § 3771 notice, which is embodied in your latest proposal, we must still object to aspects of your proposal on the ground that notice under § 3771 is per se inapplicable to this case under the Attorney General's own guidelines, because the alleged victims are not "crime victims" under § 3771. The Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance defines "crime victim" as follows: For the purpose of enforcing the rights enumerated in article I.B, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich San Francisco Washington... EFTA00617213

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA00617213.pdf
File Size 144.0 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,656 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T23:06:41.917517
Ask the Files