EFTA00617213.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
AND AIIILIATID PARTNCRSHIPS
Jay P. Lefkowitz,
To Call Writer Directly:
212 ...4
r..
6.4
VIA FACSIMILE (305) 530-6444
Honorable R. Alexander Acosta
United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of Florida
99 NE 4th Street
Miami, FL 33132
Dear Alex:
Citigroup Center
153 East 53rd Street
New York, New York 10022-4611
(212) 446-4800
December 26, 2007
Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Facsimile:
(212) 446.4900
I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last
week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our position on two issues: (1) our view on
your latest proposal regarding notification to the alleged victims under 18 U.S.C. § 3771; and (2)
our response to your proposed language regarding the 18 U.S.C. § 2255 component of the
deferred-prosecution agreement (the "Agreement"). Before I turn to these questions, I would
like to reiterate that this letter responds to your invitation to discuss proposed modifications to
the Agreement and should not be construed in any way as a breach of the Agreement. With that
said, I must tell you that the more I look into these issues, the more difficulties I see in trying to
tie the resolution of a federal criminal matter with a federal civil matter involving minors, and
this is even further complicated when the premise of the resolution is a deferred federal
prosecution conditioned on a plea to specific state offenses with a specific sentence pre-
determined and required to be imposed by the state court, without consideration of the fact that
the State view of this case differs dramatically from yours. With that in mind, I turn to each of
your questions below.
First, although we appreciate your willingness to modify your Office's § 3771 notice,
which is embodied in your latest proposal, we must still object to aspects of your proposal on the
ground that notice under § 3771 is per se inapplicable to this case under the Attorney General's
own guidelines, because the alleged victims are not "crime victims" under § 3771. The Attorney
General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance defines "crime victim" as follows:
For the purpose of enforcing the rights enumerated in article I.B, a victim is 'a person
directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an
offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in
Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or
Chicago
Hong Kong
London
Los Angeles
Munich
San Francisco
Washington...
EFTA00617213
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Phone Numbers
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00617213.pdf |
| File Size | 144.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,656 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T23:06:41.917517 |