DOJ-OGR-00002475.jpg

LOAas6 W20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 9 of 33 8 1 however, that references to health care providers in their 2 institutions may be unsealed. 3 Ms. Giuffre likewise argues that, for certain police 4 reports, the privacy interests of certain persons warrant 5 continued sealing where they were minor victims. Because thes 6 police reports were obtained through a public records request, 7 they should be unsealed and docketed in the form that they were 8 received from the law enforcement agency. This is also 9 consistent with the approach that the Court of Appeals has 10 taken. Consistent with the Court of Appeals' approach, other 11 personal information in these police reports, such as 12 addresses, should be redacted from previously undisclosed 13 reports, to the extent such information has not already been redacted by the law enforcement agency. 15 As for the names and identifying information of 16 nonparty Does: At this stage, unless otherwise noted, the only 17 Does for whom names and identifying information should be 18 unsealed are Does and 2. The Court has already noted that 19 the names of Does and 2, portions of their deposition 20 transcripts, and portions of the Palm Beach police report 21 ascribed to them, have already been made public. Doe 1 gave a 22 press interview about the subject matter of this action. Does 23 1 and 2 did, belatedly, ask that their names not be disclosed, 24 after the horse was already out of the barn. They were given 25 an additional opportunity to lodge formal objections, but did SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.¢e (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00002475