DOJ-OGR-00002476.jpg

Idas@sT2O-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 10 of 33 ye) ter or Yr d n he Si. 1 not do so. The Court ordered Doe 1's transcript released af 2 undertaking a particularized review of that transcript and 3 finding that the presumption of public access warranted 4 unsealing. Having received no normal objection from Does 1 5 2, the Court cannot discern a justification for continued 6 sealing of their names in this case's documents. Accordingl 7 the names and identifying information for Does 1 and 2 shoul 8 be unsealed. 9 Additionally, Alan Dershowitz's name and informatio 10 identifying him may be unsealed. By his letter at docket entry 11 1138, he has requested that redactions of his name in these 12 materials be unsealed in all cases. 13 Finally, excerpts of any deposition testimony for 14 nonparty Does in the Court of Appeals that has already been 15 unsealed may be unsealed here also with redactions, if any, 16 ordered by the Court of Appeals. 17 For efficiency, I will not repeat this caveat as to 18 each document; I will only comment when it is not applicable 19 Unless there is a specific comment, personal identifying 20 information for all nonparty Does should be redacted, with t 21 exception of Does 1 and 2, Professor Dershowitz, and in 22 deposition testimony already unsealed by the Court of Appeal 23 The other names of Does and identifying information 24 will remain sealed until we move to particularized 25 consideration of those Does. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.¢e (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR- 00002476