DOJ-OGR-00002497.jpg

Idas@sT2O-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 31 of 33 30 1 me to make the most sense for us to look at that group and not 2 have to go through the burden of redacting as to those 3 individuals with each round. We can address them in one 4 setting in some manner. Then we wouldn't have to be in each 5 round redacting and paying attention to people who have no 6 objection on the file. 7 THE COURT: Ms. Menninger, anything else? 8 MS. MENNINGER: just think there is a big difference 9 between people who have not objected affirmatively, like 10 Professor Dershowitz, and those from whom we have heard nothing 1] or received back no confirmation that they received the notice 12 from the Court. I think we need to treat those groups 13 differently. 14 With respect to people who affirmatively want their 15 name out there, fine, I have no problem. For those who have 16 not just simply not responded, we know for the half that we 17 served, in approximately half of the cases we never received, 18 despite a return receipt requested, any confirmation that they 19 actually received the notice. 20 MR. KRIEGER: Your Honor, if I may have a brief minute 21 to respond. 22 THE COURT: Yes, sir. 23 MR. KRIEGER: Your Honor, I just want to echo Ms. 24 Menninger's points that the mere fact that a Doe doesn't 25 object, even if they have received notice, doesn't mean that SOUTHERN D ( STRICT REPORTERS, P.C.e* 212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00002497