DOJ-OGR-00002511.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 8 of 26
resolved the allegations against himself and any potential co-conspirator. Faced with significant
public pressure, the government broke that agreement and brought an indictment against Epstein,
and only Epstein, in 2016. The charges were ultimately dismissed because Epstein died while in
federal custody. Left with no fish to attempt to fry, the government, belatedly, turned to Ms.
Maxwell.
It is inexcusable that decades have passed while the government investigated Epstein,
resolved the allegations against him by plea and non-prosecution agreements, and then changed
course when these agreements were attacked by plaintiffs’ lawyers who fueled the media fenzy.
This dithering has allowed memories to be corrupted, conflated, and confabulated. Documents
have been destroyed, altered, and lost. Witnesses have died, moved, and become afraid of
discussing these matters for fear of media vilification or, as with Ms. Maxwell, tactical
indictment by default. Meanwhile, the Epstein story continues to occupy the public’s attention
with various iterations and conflations including multiple books, podcasts, and television series
available to alleged witnesses, posers, attention-seekers, copy-cats, and opportunists for study
and exploitation.
The primary guarantees against excessive preindictment delay and the prosecution of
overly stale criminal charges are statutes of limitation for criminal offenses. United States v.
Lawson, 683 F.2d 688, 694 (2d Cir. 1982). Ms. Maxwell has separately moved to dismiss Counts
One through Four of the Indictment because those counts were brought after the expiration of the
applicable statute of limitation, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3282, which provides, in relevant part, that “no
person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense, not capital, unless the indictment
is found or the information is instituted within five years next after such offense shall have been
committed.” The government will argue that a much longer statute of limitation applies to the
DOJ-OGR-00002511
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00002511.jpg |
| File Size | 717.7 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 95.2% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,092 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 16:24:17.803274 |