EFTA00653085.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: "Barry J. Cohen"
To: Jeffrey E. <jeevacationggmail.com>
Subject: RE: FW: Leon Black - Purchase of G650
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:15:04 +0000
Glad to talk later. Sorry I wasn't clear. I want the financing condition in the Purchase Agreement. I don't care about the
LOI. Lawyers are saying that it is not normal to have it in the Purchase Agreement.
From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 1:13 PM
To: Barry J. Cohen <
Subject: Re: FW: Leon Black - Purchase of G650
Talk later? Loi means zero
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:09 PM Barry J. Cohen <
wrote:
The lawyer says that the LOI Condition section (para. 3) provides that "all systems [must be] functioning in accordance
with the manufacturers' specifications" and that cosmetic issues (scratch in the credenza will be covered in the
purchase agreement.
While I don't think we'll have trouble getting financing, I really want the purchase to be conditioned on getting
financing. The lawyers tell me that this is not a normal condition.
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:41 AM
To: BarryJ. Cohen <
>
Subject: Re: FW: Leon Black - Purchase of G650
tray table stablity and cosmetics. . entertainment system neither relate to airworthy
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Barry J. Cohen <->
wrote:
FYI
From: Barry J. Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:02 AM
To: 'Tom Mitchell'
; Deyoe, David <->;
Lee Rohde
Cc: Wimer, Ruth <->;
Ada Clapp <
Subject: RE: Leon Black - Purchase of G650
; John Castrucci
Understood. If "airworthy" is the typical provision, then this seems fine. I just wondered if there was a higher
standard that is sometimes used in contracts.
And you are saying that because we are requiring a 48-month inspection as a pre-condition to closing, we can live
with a more basic pre-buy inspection, right?
From: Tom Mitchell 1mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:58 AM
EFTA00653085
To: Barry J. Cohen c
Deyoe, David <
>; Lee Rohde
Cc: Wimer, Ruth <->;
Ada Clapp c
>; John Castrucci
Subject: RE: Leon Black - Purchase of G650
Hi Barry,
I can take a shot at these questions as others can chime in.
There are actually 4 ranking inspections offered by Gulfstream under the task of what we are calling a pre-purchase
inspection. I think we should plan to modify which level is most appropriate based on the decision to perform the
ancillary tasks like the 48 Month Inspection and bulkhead install. Reason being, is the redundancy is significant with
the 48 Month inspection; for example the interior and landing gear is removed and inspected for corrosion, which is
also done on the higher level pre-purchase inspections. Therefore, depending on who is funding which inspection,
we should manage the process to be most cost effective yet meet the necessary inspection(s).
The term airworthy may sound less than stringent, however it is an FAA legal term that is universally used to state
that the aircraft must meet its type design; meaning all systems and components must operate as designed. This
would include something as small as a reading lamp over a seat. In reality, it is a fairly conservative term with respect
to a buyer's interest. An example of a discrepancy that is actually airworthy would normally be wear and tear related
such a scratches and cosmetic findings.
Regards,
Tom
From: Barry J. Cohen [mailto
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:36 AM
To: Deyoe, David; Lee Rohde; Tom Mitchell
Cc: Wimer, Ruth; Ada Clapp; John Castrucci
Subject: RE: Leon Black - Purchase of G650
Two more things:
• Exhibit C references a "basic" pre-purchase inspection. What are the merits of doing a basic vs. premium pre-
buy inspection?
• "Airworthy" seems like a pretty low standard. Is that sufficient?
From: Deyoe, David [mailto.
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 11:25 PM
To: Barry J. Cohen
; H. Lee Rohde III
; Tom Mitchell
Cc: Wimer, Ruth <->;
Deyoe, David <
Subject: Leon Black - Purchase of 6650
Barry, Lee, and Tom —Attached are a clean version (the Word document) and a marked version (the pdf
version) of the letter of intent incorporating the changes Barry requested along with several other minor
(primarily stylistic) changes. Please review the revisions and call or email me with any comments or
questions you may have in the morning.
Dave
David P. DeYoe
McDermott Will & Emery
227 W. Monroe Street
EFTA00653086
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Office:
Mobil
***********•**************
*en ********************************************************•****************************
This message is a PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL communication. This message and all attachments are a
private communication sent by a law firm and may be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or
attached to this message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
**Io • • ••*11*************************.
Please visit http://www.mwe.com/ for more information about our Firm.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail tojeevacation@gmail.com. and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00653087
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00653085.pdf |
| File Size | 188.4 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 6,460 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T23:19:07.950646 |