EFTA00655984.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: US GIO <
To: Undisclosed recipients:;
Subject: The J.P. Morgan View: Who did it? US, EU, or both?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:53:33 +0000
Attachments: JPMorgan_View_12_Aug_2011.pdf
Inline-Images: ATT00001..gif
J.P. Morgan
Global Asset Allocation
The J.P. Morgan View: Who did it? US, EU, or both?
Click here for the full Note and disclosures.
• Economics — Further downgrades in global growth projections, largely following our US and EU cuts. Early
indicators of July activity have surprised on the upside, but not enough to offset downdraft from lower stock prices.
• Portfolio strategy — Markets need an end to bad news on both US economy and EMU crisis. Neither are on the
immediate horizon, but if one comes, US is more likely to surprise first.
• Fixed Income — Add overweights in German Bunds, this week's underperformer, and retain selective longs in EM.
• Equities — The most likely positive catalyst for equity markets in the near term is US economic data. Our US EASI
is the signal to watch.
• Credit — We are underweight US HG credit and marketweight on EM credit.
• Foreign exchange — JPY and CHF to benefit most from crisis.
• Commodities — Own commodities geared toward Asia, but underweight those anchored to the US.
Volatility spiked this week to levels rarely seen outside recessions. The four 4%+ daily moves this week in the
S&P500 have happened only 5 times before this past century. Uncertainty about the economy and the euro have
reached dangerous levels and have induced money managers to sell all positions to hide into cash plus some
government bonds. The risk is that consumers and companies do the same, pulling the economy down along with
them.
What will end the carnage and push risky assets up again? The four forces that can drive a reversal are Value
(risk assets have become so-o-o cheap); Positions (everyone who wants to sell has done so); no further bad news;
and/or Policy actions to change the negative fundamentals.
On Value, the crash of the past few weeks has obviously made risk markets a lot cheaper, and arguably more
attractive. By our reckoning, US equities, credit, bonds and metals are about midway between the levels we see
during US expansions and those in a recession (see Nikos Panigirtzoglou et al., How much of a US recession is
priced in?, Aug 11). Our economists and much of the consensus see only a 1/3 chance of a recession over the next
year, but clearly the markets needs extra protection against that risk.
Positions are not yet a support for risk markets. Only three weeks ago, stock markets were just 1% off cycle highs.
The collapse since is similar in speed, if not yet in size, to the Lehman crash. This means that most investors have not
had time to adjust their portfolios to the rise in uncertainty. Many will likely use any rebound to get out with still half
their shirt on. Our technical strategists, thus, signal more downside in coming weeks on riskier asset classes (see
Mike Krauss and David Cohen on morganmarkets.com). Positions will likely be adjusted eventually, but even when
they are, we find that Positions and Value have little timing sense. If the new information hitting the market remains
bad, then no value or position force can push asset prices up.
EFTA00655984
Most important for a turnaround in asset prices, as we learned many times, is a combination of no more bad news
and policy actions that create upside. And here things get a bit murky as there is no agreement on what events really
caused the crash. To exaggerate for a moment, market participants on the US side believe this is all about the
worsening EMU debt crisis, while those on the other side of the Atlantic primarily blame the rising risk of a US
recession. An unchanged USD/EUR suggests both are equal culprits. Equity prices have followed 2012 global and
US growth expectations quite closely.
We commented last week that policy makers are running out of ammunition, and that the bullets they have may be
blanks. Nothing has changed here. On the data, neither US growth nor the EMU crisis seem set to provide
positive news in coming weeks. On the margin, though, we suspect that if any good news arrives, it is more likely
to come from the US. Activity data through June have forced serious cuts to US growth projections, but those for July
— payrolls, claims, retail sales, car sales, Asia trade — have so far surprised on the upside. None of this is enough to
make us more optimistic on US growth as confidence has collapsed to recession levels, and the August crash in
equity prices must still pass through spending data. The ECB has started a shock strategy of buying Italian and
Spanish debt, but the market is not over-awed, given disagreements within the ECB and the fact that previous ECB
buying of smaller periphery countries did not turn spreads around. The market is sensing the approaching moment of
truth where the Euro area has to choose between disintegration or closer fiscal solidarity. Given much greater losses
from EMU disintegration, investors are hedging against this downside.
How does one invest in extreme uncertainty? Our strategy at the start of the month was to neutralise equities and
to invest as far away from the EU and US crisis points, towards EM and smaller DMs. The latter strategy has not
worked as massive de-risking has pushed investors out of these safer markets also. Short term, we can see more
downside, but 1-2 months out, we still feel that investing into stronger economies remains the right strategy.
Fixed income
Bonds rallied amid remarkable volatility, taking their cue from the gyrations of the equity market. Measured on
an intraday high-low basis, bond volatility has approached post-Lehman levels in the past two weeks (see Chart). A
key driver was central banks' decisions to fire some of the few bullets they have left. The Fed's low-for-two-years
commitment drove Treasury yields towards all-time lows, while SNB liquidity injections pushed the Swiss money
market curve into negative territory. Perhaps boldest was the ECB's decision to step in to support Spanish and Italian
bonds.
Plainly the ECB steamroller can cap Spanish and Italian yields while buying continues at this week's brisk pace (we
estimate €14-20bn on Monday alone). The question is how long the ECB is prepared to support the market, and
whether the EFSF can smoothly replace ECB buying. We retain a wary outlook on the Euro area periphery. A
pooling of fiscal sovereignty will surely be needed to defuse the crisis, yet only much deeper funding problems seem
likely to push EU leaders in this direction. For now, we recommend taking advantage of dislocations within Spanish
and Italian bond markets created by the ECB's purchases (see today's GFIMS Euro Cash for details).
Positive price momentum, negative economic momentum, supportive central banks, and Euro area tail risk
argue for duration longs. Against that are the very low level of yields, and the climate of extreme volatility. We add
over-weights in German Bunds, this week's underperformer, stay flat elsewhere in DM, and retain selective
overweights in EM local markets (e.g. South Africa).
Equities
The slump in equity markets over the past two weeks is extreme both in terms of its magnitude (-13%) but also its
speed. Rising perceptions of a US recession and persistent European stress continue to create a negative mix for
equity markets. What can stop this negative momentum?
The needed great leap forward by Euro area's policy makers is unlikely to come soon. The most likely positive catalyst
for equity markets in the near term lies with US economic data. This is not happening yet. Our US Economic Activity
Surprise Index remains in negative territory, following a two-day break at the end of July (see top chart).
Do equity markets price enough risk of a US recession? The answer is yes. Equity markets appear to be pricing in
a 60% chance of a typical US recession. A mild earnings recession, when earnings typically fall by 8%, appears to be
fully priced in (How much of a US recession is priced in? N. Panigirtzoglou et al., Aug 11). Our economists see only
one in three odds of a US recession over the next year, making equities appear attractively. Is this a good reason to
buy equities now? Not in our view. Value is rarely a good near-term signal especially when uncertainty is high.
How should investors position in the current highly uncertain environment? Our preference is for relative rather
than directional trades. The relative trades we highlighted last week are to overweight the countries that are least
vulnerable (Germany) or furthest (Japan) from the problematic spots of Europe or the US. In particular, we
EFTA00655985
recommend that investors buy DAX vs. Eurostoxx50 and MSCI Japan$ vs. MSCI World$. Across EM, we avoid
BRICs and focus exposure on ASEAN countries, i.e. long MSCI South East Asia$ vs MSCI China$. ASEAN
countries are in a sweet spot with inflation below the central bank target zone, strong currencies and healthy growth.
Credit
Credit spreads widened considerably this week given the market-wide sell-off of risk. We believe that spreads
currently reflect about a 1/2 probability of a new US recession, comparable to other risk assets. The High Grade JULI
Index widened 20bp to 211bp, yet our US HG strategists think that spreads are headed wider still to 225bp by year
end. On balance, we believe that the effects of falling US growth trends and the risks from Europe on prices will
overshadow solid corporate credit metrics over coming months.
The US HY cash index widened 35bp to 727bp and HY loans heavily underperformed on the back of the Fed's
commitment to keep interest rates low. $1.5bn of outflows from loan funds, double the previous weekly record, were a
significant reversal to the inflows seen over the last 12 months. Strong corporate liquidity suggests that in the event of
a recession (or very weak economic growth), default rates will not spike much. However, the negative technical picture
may well remain weak for some time.
In emerging markets, EMBIG spreads have not been immune, widening 19bp to 369bp. However, inflows into EM
debt over the past month registered $5bn whilst other asset classes typically saw net outflows. Our EM strategists
recommend a marketweight position given no clear signals of significant selling; rather a down-drift on limited
trading volumes.
Foreign Exchange
Currencies appear to price in less risk of recession than other markets, as judged by several metrics. Vol premia
— the difference between implied and realized volatility — are indeed at recession levels, but positions still price a
decent recovery. All three common measures of USD exposure — IMMs, currency manager betas, macro hedge fund
betas — still indicate USD shorts, whereas in recessions investors typically move from short USD to long USD as they
buy back funding currencies. Perhaps this cycle is different for the reason we have discussed before — US fiscal
policy creates no incentive to hold dollars during a global expansion and less incentive to hold them during financial
crises. But even if investors retain USD shorts during this downturn, we still suspect that cyclical currencies such as
commodity FX and high-yielders should fall further to reflect lower commodity prices and worse equity market
performance during a downturn. Thus we are short NZD vs USD.
JPY and CHF can benefit in August and even beyond the crisis. Obviously, they benefit from deleveraging if data
worsen or Fed/ECB policy fail to settle credit markets, perhaps due to doubts that monetary policy can revive growth
when rates are already at very low levels. But even if Fed/ECB liquidity stabilise markets, low-for-long rates in the US
and Europe mean that Japan and Switzerland will have little incentive to recycle their current account surpluses into
other countries for higher yields. As a consequence, their currencies to drift higher. We are long JPY vs USD and
GBP, and long CHF vs EUR.
Commodities
In a volatile week, commodities are up around 1% with losses in base metals being offset by gains in precious metals
and agriculture. Growth expectations continue to be revised lower and our US economic surprise index remains in
negative territory. We recommend investors overweight those commodities more geared towards emerging
markets, i.e. Brent, gasoil, gold, sugar, copper, corn and wheat, and underweight those anchored to US
consumption i.e., WTI, US gasoline, aluminium, zinc and US natural gas (see Commodity Phase Shift: What does
the US debt downgrade mean for commodities?, Colin Fenton, Aug 8 for more details).
This week grains rallied another 2% as the USDA revised lower their estimate of crop yields in the US. We
have expected this for some time now as we have pointed out many times before that the USDA forecasts appeared
far too optimistic. We continue to expect prices to move significantly higher through the year in order to balance
demand with the very low level of inventories. Stay long corn and higher protein wheat (see Agriculture Weekly,
Jonah Waxman, Aug 11 for more details).
Jan Loeys (AC)
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
EFTA00655986
John Normand
J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd.
Niknlanc Paninirt7nnInti
J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd.
Seamus Mac Gorain
J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd.
Matthew Lehmann
J.P. Morgan beounties Ltd.
If you no longer wish to receive these e-mails then click here to unsubscrlbe
www.morganmarkets.com
Analyst certification: I certify that: (I) all of the views expressed in this research accurately reflect my personal views about any and all of the
subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of my compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations
or views expressed herein. Important disclosures, including price charts, related to the companies recommended in this report are available in the
PDF attachment, through the search function on J.P. Morgan's website hups://mm.joinorgan.cotnidisclosuresjsp or by calling this toll free
number (1-800-477-0406).
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm
may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in
making their investment decision.
Confidentiality and Security Notice: This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is
the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and
affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately
contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.
This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the
purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege,
and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://wwwjpmorgan.corn/pages/disclosures/email.
EFTA00655987
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Phone Numbers
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00655984.pdf |
| File Size | 419.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 15,864 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T23:20:21.208728 |