EFTA00663130.pdf

From: "A. de Rothschild-2" <1 To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> Subject: Re: Fwd: Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:56:55 +0000 Dear Jeff I just finished my meetings - running to the house for a polite dinner to ask one of my exec mbrs to move aside It s totally fine for the priviledged relationship. Can we speak about all this w-end ? Are u still in NY? Thank you again so much for your time and great hospitality Pls also thi you to for her time and kindness Ariane de Rothschild Le 23 juil. 2015 a 16:37, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> a ecrit : as i mentioned - I thought at a minimum , we should memorialize our long standing privileged relationship.. so i asked kathy to opine Forwarded message From: Date: Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:27 AM Subject: Re: To: "jeffrey E." <jesioti@gmail.com> Payment doesn't need to go through Latham. I do this all the time. I retained Deloitte on behalf of the bank, but the bank pays Deloitte directly. Arrangement is solely for purposes of maintaining privilege. If you are a consultant to me at Latham, it doesn't create any of the issues you were concerned about. I would open a new client matter representing the family, and then retain you as a consultant in connection with that matter. From a privilege perspective, that is the best way to do it. EFTA00663130