Back to Results

EFTA00671026.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 70.1 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

From To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: you Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:30:10 +0000 Fine. I will be the first one again to speak directly, but I do hope you can respond candidly as well. My feelings for you have not changed. I thought they would but if it's possible. I only love you more now because I can see what had to you put up with. With that said. I have no expectations of a Pretty Woman style happy ending. Thinking about 'what I want' has proven to be counterproductive and my decisions based on those desires are usually wrong. 1 know so little about how you think about me that I wouldn't dare make any bold suggestions. My dreams have not changed very much but my expectations of them coming true have. I've described everything else in my last long email. Dan Gilbert talks about how students in his test group unknowingly set themselves up for failure when they select to have the freedom to change their minds about which photograph to keep from their school project... I'd like you to take that freedom away from me. I'd like you to invite me in or lock the door. am only referring to our romantic involvement. l truly want you to be happy so although I'd like you to play a bigger role in my life. I'll take it in any rapacity I can get. I can simply be one of your ex-girlfriends. platonic friend, or your matchmaker. lam comfortable staying within my box, but YOU need to check one in ink so we can get past this awkwurdness. PS: This is the talk I am referring to : httoftwww.ted.comliallcsidan gilben asks why are we happv.html If you speak with Dan or know the answer yourself, here is my other question - If divorce was not an option, would people not only tolerate their partners but actually BE happier in their marriages? Is that how arranged marriage works? From: JeffE Epstein To: Sent: Mon. February 7, 2011 2:17:44 PM Subject: What do you want. From To: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Mon. February 7, 2011 2:00:54 PM Subject: Re: twr The beauty of dealing with controllers is the straight forward terminology - there are very few opportunities for misunderstandings. I am trying to decipher what you mean by this and your previous mails...lam not sure. Just say it.. From: Jeffro E stein To: Sent: Mon. February 7.2011 6:53:26AM Subject: Tower; 2years ago against all controllers and the supervisors adivice, admonishment and. warning you decided to fly vfr. - 6months ago you chose to turn off your transponder. . We understand that you crashed with a very unique soul on board. your transimision has been received„however it is very very weak. are you attempting to file a new flight plan ? if so please do so electronically. we are not sure we have jurisdiction/ This is Juliet Echo -OUT The information contained in this communication is confidential. may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00671026 Unauthorized use. disclosure or copying of this communication or any pan thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jecvacation(Ovnail.com. and destroy this communication and all copies thereof. including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00671027

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA00671026.pdf
File Size 70.1 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 3,380 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T23:26:10.801072
Ask the Files