DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 3 of 239 c. Chief Judge McMahon’s Memorandum and Ordet .............:esceeeeeeeeesneeeeeeeeneeeseeeenees 71 7. Nasistraie Indes Neth 'S OFle? cncomss acon enmemcees aomeREN mmeOMER cee 74 8. Unsealing of Maxwell’s Depositions 00.2.0... ecceceseceeeeeeeeeeneeceeceaeceeneesneesaeecnaeeeeneeeneeeneees 74 9. The New York Daily News Article... cecceeceeeseeeneeceeeceeeeeeneesaeecnaeeneeeeeeesanesnaeenenesenes 75 B. The Defendant’s Suppression Motion Should Be Denied ..............ceeceeeeeeeeeeeteeeeeeeeeeeeeees 76 1. Martindell Provides No Basis to Grant the Relief the Defendant Seeks... 76 , APPICOBIG TOF cece snares oremeeRENEn STORER KERNEN SENECA eeNMNEE 76 b. DisCussiOn ........ cece eeeesessecssecnseseesseeseesseesaecnaecseesseeseeseesaeenaessaesaeesaesseesaeenaessaesaeeaeeas 79 2. Maxwell’s Fourth Amendment Claim Fails... cece seeseeseensecneesneeseeeseeeeenaeenaeeaes 82 a. Maxwell Has Not Established Standing.............e cc eecceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeecneeeeeeeeeeeesaeecnaeeeenenenes 82 1. Applicable Law... cece ceceeseeeceeseeeceeeceseeeeneesneecsaeceaeeeeneesaeecsaeeeeeeseneeeaeesnaeeneeeeneeeaeess 82 Ti, DISCUSS 101 ee coemenesnomens vnmmemescaasis enoncreaRanEiR SeRRAERNnTEE HonRIENEOeNEES HoonconEeaRestN senses 84 bs ‘The Government Acted 19 GO0d, Fails: csc: scvsnss cscs scmsesmeaneews samemmunacnnne maironimnannt 86 1. Applicable Law... ccc eeseseeeesneecseeeeneeeeneeseeeceaeeaeeseneesaeecsaecaeeseneeeaeesnaeeeneeeeneeeaeers 86 SU RD DD ESS 0101S) C0) | eee 88 c. Suppression of Certain Materials Would Be Improper Under the Inevitable Discovery DOCHIrINe oe. eee eecesecseesseseeeseessecnaecnaecaeesaesseeeseesaecnaecseesaeeseesseesaecsaecsaesseesaeeseeeatenaeenaesaes 93 i, ASIA DLS iW eco: onnemncomes amen an RONERRD cURL ARRON OREN MeN NS 93 FU RD DD ESS 0105s) C0) | eee 94 3. The Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Pursuant to the Subpoena Under the Fifth Amendment Is Without Merit... ee eee seeeeeeeseeeneenaeeneeseeeseeeeeeaees 96 a. Applicable Law ....... ccc ceecceccessseceeeceeeeesneeceeeaeeeeneesaeecsaeceaeeseneesaeessaeeaeeseneesaeesnaeeeeessees 96 ip “Che Fifth Amrenclement — GHGS) Ff crecnecener axmamcemen cxemermsenseen exmmamenacenen snonemenense 96 ii. The Fifth Amendment — Act of Production Privilege.............eeeeeeesceceeeeeeeeeeneeeeees 97 iii. The Fifth Amendment — When Private Action Is Deemed Government Action...... 98 | oR DD (S002 USS) (0) 5 eee 99 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell’s Due Process Rights............:cccesceeeeeeees 103 2, APPUCOBIG LOT weucrmenen sxemememmoe emma SOMMER xRNMRNEIN sxmaeemmeRsNE semememmeeTN 104 Ba DTSRUSSHOT cncse: cnccssnnscmens cvorimmscanninns exten aaNsit SSO ARENT O.SaNatae AGRI va ARESCNW UN vac 107 5. The Court Should Not Exercise Its Inherent Authority to Order Suppression.............. 109 a. Applicable Law 0.0... ceeeeccessceceseceneeeeeeeeaeecaeeeeeesseeesaeecsaeeeeessneesaeessaeeseeeeneesaeeesaeenes 109 b. DISCUSSION 0.0... cee eeeeeeeeceeensesseeseeeseesaecnaecneesaeeseesseesaeenaesaaesaeeseesseesaeenaesaaesaeeseeseeenaeed 110 6. The Defendant Is Not Entitled to a Hearing «00.2... eee cececeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeenaeeeseeesneesaeeeaeenes 111 B, APPCABS LAW rcs annem aeRO EIA CARROLLTON CARRERE MLR 112 b. DisCussion ...... cece eeeeceeesceseensesseesseeseessecnaecseesaeeseesseessecsaecssesaeesaevseesaeenaessaesaeeseesseenaeed 115 V. The Jury Should Decide Whether the Defendant Committed Perjury................scssee 116 A. Factual Background ..........cecceeceeeseeeseeceeeeeeneeeeeecsaecaeesneesaeecnaeeaeeseneesaeecnaeenseeseneesaeesnaeenes 117 Be APPLICABLE LAW vous accrmscemmer smmnamecomces acme cmc mE NMRERE He NEES NNO ea ATREOTNE OER ONAN 119 C. DISCUSSION... eee eeecsecsseseeeseeeseenaecnsecaeesaeeeeaecsaeensesaeesaesseeseenaessaesseesaesseesaeenaeenaesaeeeaeegs 122 1. April 2016 Deposition ..........ceeceecceeseessceceneeeeneeseeecaeceneeseneeeaeesaeeeseeseneeeaeesnaeeeeeeeeneesaeeed 123 2. July 2016 Deposition... ec ceeccseceesceceeeceeeeeeeeeseeeceaeeeseeseeeesaeecaeenseeseneesaeesnaeeneeeeeneesaeees 129 3. Matteriality 2.0... ceeceseceeeeeeeeeeeeeceeeeesecesneeseeecaeecsaeessnesseeessaecaeesnesseeesseecsaeeeeeesneesaeesateres 135 ii DOJ-OGR- 00002937