DOJ-OGR-00002938.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 239 VI. Counts Five and Six Are Properly Joined and Should Not Be Severed.................000+ 138 As APPTCEBIS LAW ese accommcnme aun ARR GM RN ARIE RRL ORIN RRR MLR 138 B. DISCUSSION ..........:ccccesecesssecesssecesssecesaeecusaeeeusaeessaeesssaeesusceesuneesueeeenneeeseeesseeessneessnresesneeess 141 VII. The Indictment Contains the Elements of Each Offense and Provides the Defendant More Than Adequate Notice of the Charges Against Her .............cssscsssssssssscssseeeees 150 As APPTCEBIS LAW ese accommcnme aun ARR GM RN ARIE RRL ORIN RRR MLR 150 B. DISCUSSION ..........:ccccesecesssecesssecesssecesaeecusaeeeusaeessaeesssaeesusceesuneesueeeenneeeseeesseeessneessnresesneeess 152 VIII. There Is No Basis to Strike Any Portion of the Indictment ...............ccssscssssrcssseecesees 157 A. Relevant Facts ........cccccccssccessseceesseeesseeeesceeessneeeseneessneeessneecnsneeseseeeeseeeseseeesseeesseeessnreeesaees 158 Be APPLICABLE LAW vous accrmscemmer smmnamecomces acme cmc mE NMRERE He NEES NNO ea ATREOTNE OER ONAN 159 C. DiSCUSSION .......c.cccecccecescceeenececssececsuecessaecesauecusaaecusaaesssaeesusaeesnseeesnsneeesneesneeesseeessneeeesieeesaas 161 IX. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count One or Count Three as Multiplicitous Is ec 169 Acs RGIGWOTE PAGS coe: ascscmonmes acre, cermeen GSI CR ARIE Me RRL AORN RRR TE MLR 169 B. Applicable Law... ccc ceecceecceesseceneceeeeeseeeeseecaeceaeeeseeesseecaecaeeeeneesaeecsaeeneeeseneesanessaeeeneeenee 170 C. DISCUSSION .........:ceecceeeeeeeeeceeeceseeeeneeseeecsaeeeaeeseeesaeecaaecaeeenessatessaecaeseenessneesaeessaeeeeneneneeeaeess 172 X. The Defendant’s Various Disclosure Motions Should be Denied .................sssessscssesees 174 As Hill af Particulars 18 NOt WarSHIGE cn onus cnme: oom eRe ENR RRNN a eRTERSR 174 1. Applicable Law... ee cece cececeseeeeeeeeeeceeeeeseeeeneesaeecsaecaeeeeneesaeecsaeeeaeeseneeeaeesnaeeeeeeseneeeaneed 174 2. DISCUSSION. ........:cceeceeeseeesceceeeeeseeeeneesaceceaecneeeseeesaeecsaeeaeeeeeeesaeecaeesneeseneesaeesnaeeeeeteneenaeers 178 B. The Defendant’s Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied ..........e cc eececeseceeeeeeeeeseeeceeceseenneesaeecseecaeeeseevseeesaeecaeeeeeseneesaeessaneneneeenes 182 Ly ACGPlSSBIS Laie cocommcsem sxmmeemeenn smaRENE eRRENRERLENON SRM sem eae: 182 2. DISCUSSION. ........:ceeeeeeeeeesceceneceeeeeneesaeecsaecsaeeeeneesaeecaeeaeeeseeesaeecaeeeaeeseneesaeesnaeeseeeeneeenners 184 C. The Defendant’s Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied... 185 XI. The Use of a Grand Jury Siting in White Plains Was Entirely Proper...................00 193 Acs ECR GPO rs soe ascecmcanmees scree eR GLARE IER CLR ARE MG RRL ORIN RRR ML 194 1. The SDNY and Local Rules for the Division of Business ..............eceeeeeereeeeeeeneeeeeeee 194 2. The SDNY Jury Plan oo... cee eecesececeeeceeeeeeeeesneeceaeeeeeseeeesaeecnaeeeeeseneesaeesnaeeeneeseneeeaeees 195 B. Applicable Law... ccc ceecceeccessseceneceeeeeseeesaeecsaeeeeeeeseeesaeecsaeenaeessneesaeecsaeeeeeseneesaeessaeenneesees 197 C. DISCUSSION .........::ceeceeeeesseeeeseceseeeeneesaeecsaeeeaeesneesaeecsaecnaeeseeeseeesaeecsaeeeseeesaeesaeestaeenneseneeeneees 198 1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains .......... 198 2. The Defendant’s Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless .............cecceecceesceeeeeeeeeeeeeeennes 205 a. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly Represented .........ceceecceeececsneceneeeeneesneecseeceaeeeseeesaeecsaecaecesneesaeecaeecsaeeeseessneeseessaeeseneeaes 205 b. Any Potential Underrepresentation Is Not Due to Systematic Exclusion...............4. 210 CONCLUSION secs sascovsanecvavs ssmests cs sccann anousn ss srouanaanansws ss anesies sauusa se miewia canon aeaua aaa aE 212 ili DOJ-OGR- 00002938