DOJ-OGR-00002941.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 7 of 239 Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., SOT LhSs [AZ (2012) ccroscecen axrmemescommews ocareninn sees i Aceon SaRIREN Se cNEER RISEN oa ANRC TOG a I ARE MH 51 Colorado v. Connelly, AT9 U.S. 157 (1986) oo. eeceeececececeeeeeseeeseeecseecaeeeeneeseeesseecsaeesnesseeesaeesaeeseeeeneesaeesnaeens 139, 141, 142 Colorado v. Spring, AT9 U.S. 564 (1987) ooo. ceccecececeneceeeeeseeecseeceseeeeeeseeesnaeceaeeeneesaeecsaesaeeeeeesaeecaeesaeeesneesaeessaeeneeees 138 County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998) ....eeceecceescesseecsseceeeeeeneesaeecaeeeseeseneesaeecsaecaeesseeesaeecaeeseeseneesaeessaeenteeeeneeenees 152 Cruz v. Maypa, 773 F.3d 138 (4th Cir, 2014) oo... cee ceecceeeeecneeceeeeeeeeeseeecseeceeeeseeesaeecsaeceaeeseneesaeesnaeeneeseneesaeessaeen 43 Davis v. United States, eo OR eh re 122 Doe I v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201 (S.D. Fla. 2019)... eee eececeeeceneceseeeeseecaeceeeeseneeseneesneecnaeeeeeeseneesanessatens 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) oo... eeecceecececeeeeeeeeeeseeceeceeeeseeesaeecaeeseeseneesaeeesaeens 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, ADS LBs FAD (199 D) exces acco cxsemmsceceranse amen omen os Ne ORR HSE SERS ch STENT RETO SION AE MEH 76 Duren vy. Missouri, A439 U.S. 357 (1979) oo. cecccececeneceeeeeeneeceneceaeeeenevsneecsaecaeessnessaeecseesaeceneesneesaeesnaeenenessneeeaees 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (RJS), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007)... ceeceeeeeeeeeeseeeteeees 234 Falter v. United States, 23 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1928) ooo. ceeeeceeececseeceeeeeeneeseeecseecaeesseeesneecsaecaeeenessneesieeseaeeeeneseneesanessaeen 45 Fisher v. United States, A2S U.S. 391 (1976) oo. eeeceececeneceeeeeeneesaceceaeceseeeeneesaeecaeeaeessneesaeecsaeceseeseneesaeessaeenteeseetensaes 140, 146 Flagg v. Yonkers Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 396 F.3d 178 (2d Cir, 2005) oo... ceeeeeseseeeesseeenneceeeeseeesacecsaeeseessneesaeesaeeaeeeseeesaeessaeenteeeeneeeaees 143 Franks v. Delaware, A388 U.S. 154 (1978) ooo eececeeeceeeeeseeecneeenseeeeneesaeecaeenseeeeneesaeecaeeeeeseneesanersaeees 166, 169, 170, 171 Gatto, 17 Cr. 686 (LAK) ....eceeceeeceessceceeeceseeeseeeseeecsaeceaeeesneesneessaecnaeesseessaeesaeecaeesseeseneesaeeenaeeseeeeeneeeaees 275 Golino v. City of New Haven, OSU Paid BG: (2a Cie, POF) ccesmcnmoanen sxememenaoe erm SERROMRNERNORN KRIS semmeemeERNS seme 125 Graham v. Connor, A490 U.S. 386 (1989) ooo. eececeeeceeeeeseeeceeceaeeseneesaeecsaecaeesneesanecsaesaeesseeesaeecsaeesseeeeneesaeessaeesneees 151 Grant v. United States, 282 F.2d 165 (2d Cir. 1960)... cee ceececececeseeeeeeeseeeceeeceseeesneeseeecaeceaesseeesaeecaeesseeseneesaeessaeesrenees 164 Greer v. Miller, ASS LS. 156 (1987) orm ano ascamcnemm anemones ca mreG ZENER mLAOSSW ORR Ha NONE CONTR LNA ECTS ML 158 Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391 (1957) ..eeeceeecceeceeesceceeeeeeeeeneesaeecsaeceeeessneesaeecsaeeseeseneesaeecaeesseeseneesaeessaeeneeseeneeenees 248 Hamling v. United States, A18 U.S. 87 (1974) oe eeccesececeneeeeeeeeneesaeecaeeeaeeeeneesaeecnaeesaeessneesaeecsaeenseesseeesaeesnaeeesneseneeeaees 225, 227 Vi DOJ-OGR-00002941