DOJ-OGR-00002942.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 239 Hemphill v. United States, BOD FO 4S: (Sth, Cie, 19GB) cscsmassemsvss sccensomnsusrews asttenwn ianite shseReOnSENESNE LAEREORTAAURETSND SaNROOL SEAT SES 268 Herring v. United States, S555 US. 135 (2009) oe eceseseeesesseeseeneesecneeseesseseessesseveecnevseeneeeesaessesaesaevsesnavseesaeeeesaeseeseeenees 123 Howell v. Superintendent Rockview SCT, 939 F.3d 260 (2d Cir. 2019) oo... eee seseesessecsseseesseseessessevsecnevsecneeseesnessesaesaeverenevseeneeseesaeseesaeenee 302 Huddleston v. United States, A85 U.S. 681 (1988) oes ceeesecseesecneesecseseeseseessesaevsecnevsecneeseesaeseesaesaevaesnevsesnaeseenaeseesaesaeeaeeaeed 254 In re Enter. Mort. Acceptance Co. Sec. Litig. (“Enterprise”, ), 391 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2004)... ee eeeseeesecneseecneesecneeseesaeseessesseveesneeseeneeseesaesaeeaeeneeats 36, 43, 44 In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Apr. 19, 1991, aD Feed TE) CER CI, TT crema semanas smart omemuRRCoReNE aLmsRMERACSEES ease 108, 113 In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992, 1 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1993) oo. cieeceseccseescsseseessessessecsevseeneeseenseseesaeseevaecneveeenaeeesaeseesaesaeearens 140, 145 In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 826 F.2d 1166 (1987) ....eceeescesseeeesseenevseceesecsnessesaesaevsesnevsecneeseensesseaesaeveesneverenaeseesaeseeaeeaeeatens 136 In re Grand Jury Subpoena, B26 Fd 1468 (Ai Gi, TORE) ccna concn sasmememncennews «.ceemocreaiewt c.sNnIL SONS SL SOTREOE SRNANE MaAORTNRARUER SR 149 In re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 29, 1999, 191 F.3d 173 (2d Cir, 1999) ooo ecesessessesneeeeeneeseceeseesaeseesaesaeveeenevseenaeseesaeseesaeeaeeetens 139 In Re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Jan. 5, 1988, 847 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir. 1988)... cee eceeesseeseseeveeeneeseceeesecsaeseesaesaevsecneeseenaeseesaesetsaeeaeeatens 136 Inre US., 834 F.2d 283 (2d Cir. 1987) 0... eecseeccsesecssessessessevsecnevsecneeeesaessesaesaevsesnevseenaeeeesaessesaeeaeeerens 284 In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas, 924 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App’x 37 (2d Cir. 2014) oe eens 140 Int’! Equity Invs., Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd., No. 05 Civ. 2745 (JGK) (RLE), 2010 WL 779314 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2010)... ce eeeeeeeeeee 111 Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997) occ ceceeceseseesseeevsecsevsecneeseessesseaecaevsecnevseenaeeresaessessesaevsesneverenaeeeesaeraeeaeeneed 200 Kungys v. United States, A85 U.S. 759 (1988) oo. eceseseessesseeseeneeseceessessessessecseveecnevsecsceseesaessesaessevaesnevereneeseesaessesaesseseeeneed 222 Landgraf vy. USI Film Products, eS 35, 36, 41, 42 Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (2004) ooo cececcseescnsesecnsessesaessevseenevsecneeseenaeseesaeseesaesaeveesnevseenaeeeesaeseeaeeaeeareneed 56, 57 Madanes v. Madanes, 186 F.R.D. 279 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)... ccceccessssceseseeesesseenevsecneeseesaeseesaeseessesaevseenevseenaeseesaesaeeaeenees 141 Martindell v. Int’l Tel. and Tel. Corp., 504 Fld 201 (28 Cit, TOTO) .cccmmsammens sexananes sss mae canans oI ARENOAR MMC ATOR cARRRNERN IE passim Martinez v. McAleenan, 385 F. Supp. 3d 349 (S.D.N-Y. 2019) oo. cieeccsesscseseesseseesseseeesesnevseeneeseesaeseesaesaesaeeneeats 150, 151 Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433 (1974) oe eeesessseeneesecneeseceseseesseseesaeeneveesnevsecnseseesaessesaessevaesnevsreneeseesaeseesaesaeeaeenees 137 vil DOJ-OGR-00002942