Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00002968.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 733.4 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.5%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 34 of 239 not parties to the agreement. This position is at odds with the law in this Circuit, which presumes a narrow reading of the boundaries of a plea agreement unless a defendant can affirmatively establish that a more expansive interpretation was contemplated.”) (citing Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672). To hold otherwise would turn Annabi on its head. The defendant next argues that the following provision of the NPA evinces an intent to bind the entire federal government: In consideration of Epstein’s agreement to plead guilty and to provide compensation in the manner described above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to “United States” which, as noted above, is insufficient, the defendant does not point to any language in this provision that purportedly binds other districts. Instead, she argues that the absence of language specifically limiting this provision to the USAO-SDFL demonstrates an intent to bind the entire federal government. This argument fails, for at least three reasons. First, the defendant’s argument inverts the holding of Annabi: in this Circuit, the presumption is that plea agreements bind only the district in which they are entered, absent affirmative indications otherwise. Put differently, the absence of express limiting language in this provision is not an affirmative indication of a broader application. Accordingly, under Second Circuit law, the absence of limiting language in this specific provision provides no support for the defendant’s motion. Second, the defendant’s argument acknowledges that the plain terms of the NPA immunized Epstein from prosecution in “this District,” that is, the Southern District of Florida. See NPA at 2 (“After timely fulfilling all the terms and conditions of the Agreement, no DOJ-OGR- 00002968

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00002968.jpg

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00002968.jpg
File Size 733.4 KB
OCR Confidence 94.5%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,174 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 16:29:10.974517