Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 46.7 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 91.8%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 8 of 11 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document296 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2009 Page 8 of 33 Page 8 also prepared affidavits regarding Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, which are attached to DE 247. Memecrandum Of Law 20. Plaintiffs’ motion is required to be denied as they have failed to meet their burden showing the “extraordinary circumstances” necessary tc establish good cause to support a protective order which would grant the extraordinarily rare relief of preventing a named party from attending in person the deposition of another named patty. Also requiring denial of Plaintiffs’ motion is the fact that it seeks to exclude Epstein from all the depositions of all the Plaintiffs in actions before this Court. Such relief is unprecedented and attempts to have this Court look at the Plaintiffs” collectively as opposed to analyzing each case based on facts versus broad speculation whether “extraordinary circumstances” exist on a case by case basis. In other words, the standard is such that the Court would be required to determine whether each Plaintiff has met her burden, should the Court consider adopting such extraordinary relief. On its face, the motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7. Discussion of Law Requiring the Denial of the Requested Protective Order Rule 26(cKI KE), Fed.R.Civ-P. (2609), governing protective orders, provides in relevant part that: (1) In General, A party or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court where the action is pending—or as an alternative on matiers relating to a deposition, in the court for the district where the deposition will be taken. The motion must include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action. The court may, for good cause, issue an order tao protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: i i * * * (E) designating the persons who may be present while the discovery is conducted; 03956-11001 DOJ-OGR-00030289

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00030289.tif
File Size 46.7 KB
OCR Confidence 91.8%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,274 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 21:39:23.230520