Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00003059.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 706.5 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 93.0%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 125 of 239 to produce documents, the contents of which are not privileged, where the act of production is, itself, (1) compelled, (2) testimonial, and (3) incriminating.” Jn re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 29, 1999, 191 F.3d 173, 178 (2d Cir. 1999). Consistent with these requirements, the privilege only “prohibits the compelled disclosure of documents when the act of production has independent communicative aspects—such as an admission that the documents exist, that the subject possesses or controls the documents, that the documents are authentic, or that the subject believes the documents are responsive to the subpoena.” Jn re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas, 924 F. Supp. 2d 549, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App’x 37 (2d Cir. 2014); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 408 (1976). It follows that the privilege does not apply when “[t]he existence and location of the [sought] papers are a foregone conclusion and the [compelled individual] adds little or nothing to the sum total of the Government’s information by conceding that he in fact has the papers.” /d. at 411; see also In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2d Cir. 1993); Madanes v. Madanes, 186 F.R.D. 279, 284 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (“[E]ven if documents contain incriminating information, requiring a person to produce them does not implicate the Fifth Amendment unless the act of production is itself testimonial in nature and incriminating to the person making the disclosure.”). lil. The Fifth Amendment — When Private Action Is Deemed Government Action As discussed above, “[t]he sole concern of the Fifth Amendment. . . is governmental coercion.” Connelly, 479 U.S. at 170. “[T]he Fifth Amendment privilege is not concerned ‘with moral and psychological pressures to confess emanating from sources other than official coercion.’” Jd. (quoting E/stad, 470 U.S. at 305). For this reason, even “[t]he most outrageous 98 DOJ-OGR-00003059

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00003059.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00003059.jpg
File Size 706.5 KB
OCR Confidence 93.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,043 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 16:30:16.964505