Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00003060.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 721.0 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.5%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 126 of 239 behavior by a private party seeking to secure evidence against a defendant does not make that evidence inadmissible.” Connelly, 479 U.S. at 166. This does not mean that only action undertaken directly by the Government may violate the Fifth Amendment (or another right). In certain circumstances, a private entity may be deemed to be acting as a government agent. See United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130, 146 (2d Cir. 2008) (“Actions of a private entity are attributable to the State if there is a sufficiently close nexus between the State and the challenged action of the entity so that the action of the latter may be fairly treated as that of the State itself.” (internal quotation marks and ellipsis omitted)). However, this standard “‘is not satisfied when the state merely approves of or acquiesces in the initiatives of the private entity, or when an entity is merely subject to governmental regulation.” Id. (internal quotations marks and citations omitted; alterations incorporated)). Nor is it sufficient that a non-government entity chooses to cooperate with a government investigation or has its own parallel investigation. See id. at 150. Non-government action is attributable to the government “only when it can be said that the State is responsible for the specific conduct of which the [defendant] complains.” Blum v. Yaretsky, 457 U.S. 991, 1004 (1982) (emphasis in original). “Such responsibility is normally found when the State ‘has exercised coercive power or has provided such significant encouragement, either overt or covert, that the choice must in law be deemed to be that of the State.’” Stein, 541 F.3d at 147 (quoting Blum, 457 U.S. at 1004); see also Flagg v. Yonkers Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 396 F.3d 178, 187 (2d Cir. 2005). b. Discussion As an initial matter, the defendant’s Fifth Amendment claim fails because she has not demonstrated state action. Boies Schiller is not an agent of the Government and has not been at any time during the course of the Government’s investigation, including when it initiated the civil 99 DOJ-OGR-00003060

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00003060.jpg

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00003060.jpg
File Size 721.0 KB
OCR Confidence 94.5%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,146 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 16:30:17.228723