Back to Results

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00030.png

Source: DOCUMENTCLOUD  •  Size: 218.8 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 95.6%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page25 of 25 (5) District courts should exercise the full range of their substantial powers to ensure their files do not become vehicles for defamation. For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the orders of the District Court entered on November 2, 2016, May 3, 2017, and August 27, 2018, ORDER the unsealing of the summary judgment record as described herein, and REMAND the cause to the District Court for particularized review of the remaining materials. In undertaking this task, the District Court may be well-served by ordering the parties to submit to the Court unredacted, electronic copies of the remaining sealed materials, as well as specific, proposed redactions. The District Court may also order the parties to identify and notify additional parties whose privacy interests would likely be implicated by disclosure of these materials. In the interests of judicial economy, any future appeal in this matter shall be referred to this panel. 25

Document Preview

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00030.png

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00030.png
File Size 218.8 KB
OCR Confidence 95.6%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 1,012 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:22:11.920800