DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00029.png

Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page24 of 25 readers may take the reference to “court papers” as some sort of marker of reliability. This would be a mistake. We therefore urge the media to exercise restraint in covering potentially defamatory allegations, and we caution the public to read such accounts with discernment. Il. CONCLUSION To summarize, we hold as follows: (1) Materials submitted in connection with a motion for summary judgment are subject to a strong presumption of public access. (2) The summary judgment record at issue will be unsealed upon issuance of our mandate, subject to minimal redactions.°>! (3) Materials submitted in connection with, and relevant to, discovery motions, motions in limine, and other non- dispositive motions are subject to a lesser—but still substantial— presumption of public access. (4) The District Court is directed to review the remaining sealed materials individually and unseal those materials as appropriate. 51 See note 22, ante. 24