Back to Results

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00063.png

Source: DOCUMENTCLOUD  •  Size: 303.9 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.7%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page14 of 77 No further communication will be provided by her on this matter. Thanks for your understanding. Best Ross Ross Gow ACUITY Reputation Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts—so not a new individual. The allegations made by Victoria Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue. The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue. Each time the story is re told [sic] it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms Roberts [sic] that Alan Derschowitz [sic] is involved in having sexual relations with her, which he denies. Ms Roberts claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicised as news, as they are defamatory. Ghislaine Maxwell’s original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same. Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims. EXHIBIT F (emphasis supplied). We refer to this email as “the January 2015 statement.” 21. Mr. Barden, who prepared the January 2015 statement, did not intend it as a traditional press release solely to disseminate information to the media. So he intentionally did engage a public relations firm, such as Mr. Gow’s firm Acuity Reputation, to prepare the statement. See EXHIBIT K §fJ 10,15. 22. The January 2015 statement served two purposes. First, Mr. Barden intended that it mitigate the harm to Ms. Maxwell’s reputation from the press’s republication of plaintiffs false allegations. He believed this could be accomplished by suggesting to the media that, among other things, they should subject plaintiffs allegations to inquiry and scrutiny. For example, he noted in the statement that plaintiff's allegations changed dramatically over time, suggesting that they are “obvious lies” and therefore should not be “publicised as news.” Jd. J 11.

Document Preview

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00063.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00063.png
File Size 303.9 KB
OCR Confidence 94.7%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,043 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:22:20.726825