Back to Results

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00091.png

Source: DOCUMENTCLOUD  •  Size: 290.9 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 93.5%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page42 of 77 “pertinent to a good faith anticipated litigation.” 28 N.E.3d at 16. Upon establishing that element, summary judgment for the defendant is required. See id. Additionally, this is a summary judgment proceeding. Plaintiff cannot rely on the allegations of her Complaint. Evidence is required. The following evidence is not in dispute. By January 2015 Ms. Maxwell had retained British Solicitor Philip Barden to represent and advise her in connection with plaintiff's publication in the British press of salacious, defamatory allegations of criminal sexual abuse during the period 1999-2002. EXHIBIT K {ff 8-10. Mr. Barden in turn engaged UK press agent Ross Gow. Jd. § 9. Mr. Barden prepared the January 2015 statement and instructed Mr. Gow to transmit it via email to members of the UK media who had made inquiry about the allegations in the joinder motion. Jd. § 10. Mr. Barden did not intend the January 2015 statement as a traditional press release solely to disseminate information to the media. Jd. § 15. This is why he intentionally did not request that Mr. Gow or any other public relations specialist prepare the statement. Jd. Instead, Mr. Gow served as his conduit to the media representatives who had requested a response to the joinder motion allegations and who Mr. Barden believed might republish those allegations. /d. Mr. Barden had two purposes in preparing and causing the statement to be disseminated to those media representatives. First, he wanted to mitigate the harm to Ms. Maxwell’s reputation from the press’s republication of plaintiff's false allegations. Jd. § 16. He believed these ends could be accomplished by suggesting to the media that, among other things, they should subject plaintiff's allegations to inquiry and scrutiny. Jd. For example, he noted in the January 2015 statement that plaintiff's allegations changed dramatically over time, suggesting that they are “obvious lies” and therefore should not be “publicised as news.” Jd. 35

Document Preview

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00091.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00091.png
File Size 290.9 KB
OCR Confidence 93.5%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,041 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:22:31.298930