DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00121.png

Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page72 of 77 Q: It’s correct that you were not sexually trafficked to them, right? A: You’ve asked me this three times and I’m telling you. EXHIBIT II at 10-12. Indeed, Plaintiff became frustrated by what she perceived as the third time she was asked the question, each time denying that she had met a foreign president or been sexually trafficked to one, clearly indicating that she understood the question, had answered it in the negative and did not want to be re-asked the question again.*° Notably, not a single “foreign president” is listed as a witness with knowledge of Plaintiffs claims in her Rule 26 disclosures. “Well-known prime minister.” Plaintiff also has failed to establish any evidence to support her fantastical claim that she was sexually trafficked to a “well-known prime minister.” When questioned, she refused to disclose the identity of the prime minister, even with the protection of a protective order. EXHIBIT II at 12. She has not produced photographs of her with any well-known prime minister, nor any flight log showing a well-known prime minister on Epstein’s airplane. She has not identified herself as being in any location with a well-known prime minister, nor the date of any such encounter. The only evidence that Plaintiff has ever been even in the company of a well-known prime minister is her uncorroborated word. “World leaders.” Likewise, when asked about “world leaders” to whom she was trafficked, Plaintiff referred vaguely to someone she was introduced to as a “‘prince.” Q: Other world leaders, what other world leaders were you sexually trafficked to? [Objection interposed and overruled by Special Master] A: Okay. Prince Andrew for one. Q: Other than Prince Andrew? >6Plaintiff and her counsel later devised a plan to just outright change these three answers through the errata sheet, claiming that Plaintiff had “misunderstood the question” and she had in fact been trafficked to such a president. EXHIBIT JJ. As her clear answers and frustration at the repeated nature of the questioning demonstrates, however, she had no trouble whatsoever understanding the question at the time. 65