DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00187.png

Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230, Page54 of 648 ROSS NEIL SUTHERLAND GOW - 11/18/2016 Page 30 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 worse objection, or worse grounds for me. MR. DYER: I think questions of payment do not fall within the scope. BY MS. SCHULTZ: Q. Okay. Are you currently retained by Ms. Maxwell for professional services. A. If I could go back to my previous answer, Ms. Maxwell is a project client, and it's on a day rate. If -- so, for the sake of argument between 2nd\ of January 2015 and the 1st of February 2016 we\were quite busy answering these incoming calis\ so>there was quite a lot of work at that point im time) Recently there's been no work. There's been,no need-bécause the press activity has died down, our fun@tion is somewhat redundant. Q. Can you €stimate the last time that you worked on this account\at your day rate? A. It would>have been in 2015. Probably April, May, something/like that. No invoices, no -- no payment in 2016 from my recollection. BY MS. SCHULTZ: Q. Mr. Gow, I'm going to hand you another document. (Exhibit 3 was marked for identification.) MS. SCHULTZ: Point of procedure: I have only three copies of these documents for each of the 1-800-325-3376 DTI Court Reporting Solutions - New York www.deposition.com 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 08: 56: 56: 56: 56: 56: 56: 257: 257: 57: 57: 357 57: 57: 57: 57: 30 58: 58: 30 138 338 339 42 :03 :06 08 12 15 330 41 47 4] 57:49 148 09 11