DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00824.png

Case 18-2868, Document 280, 08/09/2019, 2628232, Page5d of 74 C. Defendant’s January 2015 Statement Claiming as “Untrue” or an “Obvious Lie” That Maxwell and Epstein Converted Ms. Giuffre Into a Sexual Slave is Not Substantially True... eee ee cseeseeeseeesescseeeesescseeesseseeesesseeeesseesseaeseeee 60 D. Any Statement of Misdirection Regarding Professor Alan Dershowitz is Nothing More Than an Irrelevant Distraction to The Facts of This Case and Matters Not on the Defense of Whether Defendant’s Statement Was Substantially True E. Contrary to Defendant’s Position, There is a Genuine Issue of Material Fact as to Whether She Created or Distributed Child Pornography, or Whether the Government Was Aware Of Same. .0.......cecceceeseeeeseseseeeesesceeeeeseseeesseseeesaeseeeeenas 62 F. Defendant Did Act as a “Madame” For Epstein to Traffic Ms. Giuffre to The Rich and Famous. .........c.cccecesessesssesceseeesesseseseseeeescseseeeesesecessesceesecseseeesseseeesaeseeeeeeas 63 TX. CONCLUSION ooo. c cece cecsessececseseeecseseeeacseesesaesecesacsceesessessasesseeeasseeeeeraeseeees 65