DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00840.png

Case 18-2868, Document 280, 08/09/2019, 2628232, Page21 of 74 summary judgment — as well as all previous briefing papers — are absolutely silent on those damning documents. 2. The Photographs Throughout a mountain of briefing and, and even in her own deposition testimony, Defendant never offered an explanation regarding Ms. Giuffre’s photographs of her, Defendant, and Epstein. She never offered a legal explanation for why Prince Andrew was photographed with his hand around Ms. Giuffre’s bare waist while she was a minor child, while posing with Defendant, inside Defendant’s house in London. This particular photograph corroborates Ms. Giuffre’s claims, and there is no other reasonable explanation why an American child should be in the company of adults not her kin, in the London house owned by the girlfriend of a now- ‘ 20 convicted sex offender. Ms. Giuffre also produced pictures of herself taken when she was in New York with Defendant and Epstein, and from a trip to Europe with Defendant and Epstein:”’ 2° See McCawley Dec at Exhibit 42, GIUFFRE007167, Prince Andrew and Defendant Photo. 2! See McCawley Dec at Exhibit 42, GIUFFRE007182 - 007166. 13