DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00896.png

Case 18-2868, Document 281, 08/09/2019, 2628234, Page3 of 66 Media contact: Ross Gow Acuity Reputation Tel: +44-203-008-7790 Mob: +44-7778-755-251 Email: ross@acuityreputation.com Media contact: Ross Gow, Acuity Reputation, Tel: +44-203-008-7790, Mob: +44-7778-755-251, Email: ross at acuityreputation.com GIUFFRE001067-68 MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS The document speaks for itself although it is unclear if the original included the italics that are inserted by the Defendant above. DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 5. Ms. Giuffre’s gratuitous and “lurid” accusations in an unrelated action. In 2008 two alleged victims of Epstein brought an action under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act against the United States government purporting to challenge Epstein’s plea agreement. They alleged the government violated their CVRA rights by entering into the agreement. MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS While we would stipulate to the statement in this paragraph starting with the words “In 2008” , we do not stipulate to the opening sentence fragment Maxwell places in bold. DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 6. Seven years later, on December 30, 2014, Ms. Giuffre moved to join the CVRA action, claiming she, too, had her CVRA rights violated by the government. On January 1, 2015, Ms. Giuffre filed a “corrected” joinder motion. MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS Agreed. DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 7. The issue presented in her joinder motion was narrow: whether she should be permitted to join the CVRA action as a party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, specifically, whether she was a “known victim[] of Mr. Epstein and the Government owed them CVRA duties.” Yet, “the bulk of the [motion] consists of copious factual details that [Ms. Giuffre] and [her co-movant] ‘would prove . . . if allowed to join.”” Ms.