DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00917.png

Case 18-2868, Document 281, 08/09/2019, 2628234, Page24 of 66 DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 28. Ms. Giuffre repeatedly has sought out media organizations to discuss her alleged experience as a victim of sexual abuse. MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS Denied. Ms. Giuffre was approached by numerous media outlets and refused to speak to most of them. Media organizations sought her out; she did not seek them out. See McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 35, GIUFFRE003690, email from Sharon Churcher seeking to interview Ms. Giuffre. DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 29. On December 30, 2014, Ms. Giuffre publicly filed an “entirely unnecessary” joinder motion laden with “unnecessary,” “lurid details” about being “sexually abused” as a “minor victim[]” by wealthy and famous men and being “trafficked” all around the world as a “sex slave.” MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS See Ms. Giuffre’s Paragraph 7, supra, listing multiple reasons why details were, in fact, necessary. DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 30. The Ms. Giuffre’s alleged purpose in filing the joinder motion was to “vindicate” her rights under the CVRA, expose the government’s “secretly negotiated” “non-prosecution agreement” with Epstein, “shed tremendous public light” on Epstein and “other powerful individuals” that would undermine the agreement, and support the CVRA Ms. Giuffre’s’ request for documents that would show how Epstein “used his powerful political and social connections to secure a favorable plea deal” and the government’s “motive” to aid Epstein and his “co-conspirators.” MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS See Ms. Giuffre’s Paragraph 7, supra, listing multiple purposes of Ms. Giuffre’s lawyers’ filing of the motion. 24