Back to Results

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00918.png

Source: DOCUMENTCLOUD  •  Size: 325.0 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.8%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 18-2868, Document 281, 08/09/2019, 2628234, Page25 of 66 DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 31, Ms. Giuffre has written the manuscript of a book she has been trying to publish detailing her alleged experience as a victim of sexual abuse and of sex trafficking in Epstein’s alleged “sex scheme.” MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS See Ms. Giuffre’s Paragraph 52, infra, explaining that the context of this statement is misleading. DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 32. Republication alleged by Ms. Giuffre. Ms. Giuffre was required by Interrogatory No. 6 to identify any false statements attributed to Ms. Maxwell that were “‘published globally, including within the Southern District of New York,’” as Ms. Giuffre alleged in Paragraph 9 of Count I of her complaint. In response, Ms. Giuffre identified the January 2015 statement and nine instances in which various news media published portions of the January 2015 statement in news articles or broadcast stories. MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS Ms. Giuffre objects to this paragraph in its entirety, starting with the bolded heading (“Republication alleged by Ms. Giuffre”’). There is no “republication” as a matter of law in this case, as explained in Ms. Giuffre’s memorandum of law. Accordingly, Ms. Giuffre is not and has not alleged republication. As noted in her objection that, it is Defendant who possesses the knowledge as to where the defamatory statements were published; unsurprisingly, Defendant failed to comply with Ms. Giuffre’s discovery requests on the same. As Defendant already knows, Ms. Giuffre provided a sampling of Defendant’s defamatory statements published by the news media, as “identification of an exhaustive responsive list would be unduly burdensome.” This, of course, is because Defendant caused her statement to be published in an enormous number of media outlets. Ms. Giuffre’s full response to Interrogatory No. 6 is below. As the Court can see, these nine instances were a good-faith effort to provide some samples (as it would be virtually impossible to provide all of them), below. Ms. 25

Document Preview

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00918.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00918.png
File Size 325.0 KB
OCR Confidence 94.8%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,127 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:26:59.633520