DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00935.png

Case 18-2868, Document 281, 08/09/2019, 2628234, Page42 of 66 about every other crime regardless of the relevance to the crime to which the police responded and regardless to the threat to herself should she report on these powerful people. Moreover, as Professor Coonan explained: Popular understandings of the term “sex slave” might still connote images of violent pimps, white slavery, or of victims chained to a bed in a brothel in the minds of some people. To call Ms. Giuffre a victim of sex trafficking would however very accurately convey the reality that she along with a great many other victims of contemporary forms of slavery are often exploited by the “invisible chains” of fraud and psychological coercion. See McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 23, Coonan Expert Report at 20. Ms. Giuffre specifically testified that she was fearful of Defendant and Epstein, and, accordingly, she would not have reporter her abusers. She also knew that Epstein had control over the Palm Beach Police. See McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 5, Giuffre Dep. Tr. at 240:3-241:2. DEFENDANT’S PURPORTED FACTS 44. From August 2001 until September 2002, Epstein and Maxwell were almost entirely absent from Florida on documented travel unaccompanied by Ms. Giuffre. Flight logs maintained by Epstein’s private pilot Dave Rodgers evidence the substantial number of trips away from Florida that Epstein and Maxwell took, unaccompanied by Ms. Giuffre, between August 2001 and September 2002. Rodgers maintained a log of all flights on which Epstein and Maxwell traveled with him. Epstein additionally traveled with another pilot who did not keep such logs and he also occasionally traveled via commercial flights. For substantially all of thirteen months of the twenty-two months (from November 2000 until September 2002) that Ms. Giuffre lived in Palm Beach and knew Epstein, Epstein was traveling outside of Florida unaccompanied by Ms. Giuffre. During this same period of time, Ms. Giuffre was employed at various jobs, enrolled in school, and living with her boyfriend. MS. GIUFFRE’S STATEMENT CONTROVERTING DEFENDANT’S FACTS The flight logs produced in this matter provide substantive evidence of Ms. Giuffre’s travel while in the control of Defendant and Epstein, but are clearly incomplete. Moreover, Ms. Giuffre also was flown by Defendant on commercial flights. See McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 5, Giuffre Dep. Tr. at 155:5-11. Ms. Giuffre disputes Defendant’s statement to the contrary, as reliance upon incomplete records to prove that Ms. Giuffre was not in fact in the presence of 42