Back to Results

EFTA00692304.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  email/external  •  Size: 93.8 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
View Original PDF

Extracted Text (OCR)

From: "Martin Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey" <jeevacation@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:14:32 +0000 I am not at all sure that SORNA includes travel notification. So far its prohibitions have only been extended to registration and updating. Needs to be checked. Feds enacted reg to incentivize states to follow. Real issue is whether states will and if so whether there is discretion built in. (If states do not adopt they cannot violate you). If there is no such discretion I like the argument it is penalty (and your penalties cannot expand after you are sentenced). I will look into all this over weekend. MGW ---- - Original Message From: Jeffrey. To: Martin Weinberg Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:01 AM Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Yes but a prenotification ??? What other govt reg has prenotification and penalty for violating , of a right ( travel , speech ) I understand post . I can be violated for traveling without having given proper per notice??? Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jun 22, 2012, at 2:33 PM, "Martin Weinberg" < wrote: have they been added to the state laws in any/all of the states in which you are registered? if its a penalty its ex post facto and cannot enhance your sentence. if its part of tracking a registrant it would not be a penalty. the first practical issue is whether the state implementation of this added guideline includes discretion such as was being considered in VI -- Original Message — From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Alan M. Dershowitz ; Martin Weinberg Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:16 AM as the sex registrationguidlines now want 21 days notive before traveling out of the country. and they have maintaned that registration is not a penalty on an adminsitravtive reuglation to register. how does it operate if one wants to leave tomoorrow. and cannot meet the 21 day requiemmet.. it can't act as a restriction on travel. and still claim not to be a righs violation or at minimum a penalty?? The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by EFTA00692304 destroy e- oytmailomr by m mailotnoaj atio nedevaalcl pn® iesggail.c , and thereof, om EFTA00692305

Document Preview

Document Details

Filename EFTA00692304.pdf
File Size 93.8 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,590 characters
Indexed 2026-02-12T13:43:31.088413

Related Documents

Documents connected by shared names, same document type, or nearby in the archive.

Ask the Files