DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p01346.png

Case 18-2868, Document 283, 08/09/2019, 2628241, Page379 of 883 Page 6 Page 8 ; INDEX OF EXAMINATION 1 Doe right here on the copy you gave me. I'm 2 missing which Jane Doe this is. 3 WITNESS DIRECT CROSS 3 They're all different case numbers. Do ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 4 you want me to go through each case number? 4 5 MR. CRITTON: I'm going to note my 5 (By Mr. Mermelstein) 12 6 objection. Obviously if this deposition 7 gets played -- not obviously, I'm going to 6 (By Mr, Edwards) 157 8 object to the litany of each one so I don't (By Mr, Langino) 260 9 know how we can separate it out. Maybe if 7 10 and when at the time of trial and depending 3 il on how the Court determines what comes in 12 and what doesn't with regard to the 0 EXHIBITS INDEX OF EXHIBITS oe 13 consolidated aspects of this. I have no 12 1 Message pad 72 14 great idea other than just saying Jane Doe 13. 2 Documents 115 15 versus Epstein, et al, or something like 14 16 that, or Jane Doe, et al. rH 7 MS. EZELL: Couldn't we just say and 7 18 those cases which have been consolidated 18 19 with it for Discovery purposes? 19 20 MR. EDWARDS: Although there is cases 20 21 here that have cross noticed this from state 3 22 court that haven't been consolidated so that 33 23 may not work. You may have to read them 24 all, if it works out your way that will just get edited out, at least he will have read Page 7 Page 9 1 Deposition taken before MICHELLE PAYNE, Court 1 that caption, every caption. Right? Is 2 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of 2 there a better suggestion? 3 Florida at Large, in the above cause. 3 MR. CRITTON: No. There may be a better 4 Satie 4 suggestion if he starts this is such and 5 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the case of 5 such day, it's the deposition of Mr. 6 Jane Doe No. 2, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey 6 Rodriguez in the case such and such, and we 7 Epstein, defendant. Jane Doe No. 3, 7 can almost fill it in depending on which 8 plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, 8 tape it goes, how it fills in, at least 9 defendant. Jane Doe No. 4, plaintiff, 9 we'll have the context of the first and 10 versus Jeffrey Epstein, defendant. And Jane 10 depending on whether the Judge reads it in 11 Doe No. 5, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey 11 from a consolidated or they all come 12 Epstein, defendant. Jane Doe No. 6, 12 related, I have no great idea. 13 plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, 13 MR. EDWARDS: I was thinking if he read 14 defendant. Jane Doe No. 7, plaintiff, 14 every one of them and it was the seventh in 15 versus Jeffrey Epstein, defendant. CMA, 15 line then you just would edit it so you 16 plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, Ls would only read that one. E Jeffrey Epstein, et al, defendant. And Jane 18 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: On page number three 19 Doe -- is there a shorter thing that we can 19 there is something missing on the top here. 20 do here? It's also missing this one right 20 Do you want me to read each case number 21 here. 21 separately? 22 MR. MERMELSTEIN: Do we have a problem | 22 MR. MERMELSTEIN: I don't think it's 23 with saying Jane Doe 2 and the Epstein and 23 necessary. 24 related cases? 24 MR. EDWARDS: I don't think it's 25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: I'm missing this Jane necessary either. 3 (Pages 6 to 9) Kress Court Reporting, Inc. 305-866-7688 7115 Rue Notre Dame, Miami Beach, FL 33141 NON PARTY (VR) 000249