DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p01395.png

Case 18-2868, Document 283, 08/09/2019, 2628241, Page428 of 883 sites with articles containing the statements made against Ms. Giuffre that are not included in my calculations, which would increase the dissemination of the articles. b. The focus of my analysis was the dissemination of online articles containing the statements made against Ms. Giuffre, and I examined only online sources and not print or broadcast media. Many of the media outlets that I did identify have consider print distribution?>, which are not included in my calculations, for example, such as: e The Sun (print circulation) 1,741,838 e Daily Mail (print circulation) 1,562,361 e The Daily Telegraph (print circulation) 472,936 e The Times (print circulation) 402,752 e The Guardian (print circulation) 161,152 c. In my analysis, I did not attempt to measure face-to-face dissemination that may have occurred after individuals may have read articles containing the statements made against Ms. Giuffre, which would increase the count. d. Naturally, I could not access certain online sources where the statements made against Ms. Giuffre may have been disseminated (e.g., email messages, social media messages, articles behind firewalls, etc.). Therefore, these numbers are not included in my calculations. e. Also, there are possibly sites that have hosted articles containing the statements made against Ms. Giuffre where the articles have been removed. Therefore, they are not included in my calculations. 25 www.theguardian.com/media/2016/mar/17/independent-mirror-express-and-star-suffer-sharp-fall-in-traffic 27