DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p01887.png

Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page36 of 38 Fact 40 includes the statement, “Ms. Giuffre was hired as a ‘seasonal’ spa attendant to work at the Mar-a-Lago Club in the fall of 2000 after she had turned 17.” Yet, Plaintiff sets forth as her own “Undisputed Fact 58” that “Virginia [got] job at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, either months before or just after [her] 17" birthday.” Plaintiff has done nothing more than set forth her “dispute” with Defendant’s Undisputed Fact 40 as her own “undisputed fact.” It makes no sense. See also Plaintiffs “Undisputed Fact” 63. The other alleged undisputed facts are simply Plaintiff’s assertion of her deposition testimony, and hearsay of her statements to other witnesses, couched as “Undisputed Facts.” Ms. Maxwell strenuously disputes almost all of the alleged “undisputed facts” claiming that she engaged in any sexual acts, misconduct or communications with plaintiff or others; indeed, over the course of two days and thirteen hours of deposition Ms. Maxwell disputed all such allegations. Because none of Plaintiff's “undisputed facts” have anything to do with the issues raised by Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Ms. Maxwell moves to strike plaintiff's statement of “undisputed facts.” Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, Ms. Maxwell requests that the Court deem her Undisputed Facts admitted, and that the Court strike plaintiff's statement of “undisputed facts.” 35