Back to Results

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p01979.png

Source: DOCUMENTCLOUD  •  Size: 305.4 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 95.2%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 18-2868, Document 287, 08/09/2019, 2628251, Page31 of 76 31. In none of the nine instances was there any publication of the entire Press Release. Giuffre has noted extensive evidence of the mass distribution of Maxwell’s defamatory statement to over 66 million viewers as stated by her expert witness James Jansen (“Jansen”). 32. Maxwell and her agents exercised no control or authority over any media organization, including the media identified in Giuffre’s response to Interrogatory No. 6, in connection with the media’s publication of portions of the Press Release Giuffre has disputed this statement and noted it is completely devoid of record evidence and that the record establishes that Maxwell hired Gow because his position allowed him to influence the press to publish her defamatory statement, Dep. Tr. at 13:9-16; 15:18-16:3; 109:12-22; 110:16-21; 111:3-7, and that Maxwell caused her statement to be published by numerous major news organizations with wide readership all over the globe. 31

Document Preview

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p01979.png

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p01979.png
File Size 305.4 KB
OCR Confidence 95.2%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 1,020 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04 12:31:44.092760