DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p02013.png
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 18-2868, Document 287, 08/09/2019, 2628251, Page65 of 76
are not substantially true.” Boehner v. Heise, 734 F.
Supp. 2d 389, 399 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).
The motion for summary judgment to dismiss the
defamation on the ground of substantial truth is denied as not
having been established by undisputed material facts.
vI. The Defamation Claim is Not Barred by New York Law
Maxwell has moved to dismiss the complaint on the
ground that the Press Release is opinion and protected by the
pre-litigation privilege under New York law. Because New York
law does not support Maxwell’s position, the motion for summary
judgment based on the characterization of the Press Release as
opinion and as protected by a pre-litigation privilege is
denied.
1. The Press Release is Not Opinion.
As previously held, Maxwell’s statement that Giuffre’s
claims of sexual assault are lies is not an expression of
opinion:
65
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p02013.png |
| File Size | 281.2 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 94.9% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 910 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04 12:31:49.483136 |