DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p02002.png

Case 18-2868, Document 287, 08/09/2019, 2628251, Page54 of 76 to a lack of evidence . . . on an essential element of the non- movant’s claim... . [T]he nonmoving party must [then] come forward with admissible evidence sufficient to raise a genuine issue of fact for trial . .. .” Jaramillo v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 536 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir. 2008) (internal citations omitted) ; see also Goenaga v. March of Dimes Birth Defects Found., 51 F.3d 14, 18 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Once the moving party has made a properly supported showing sufficient to suggest the absence of any genuine issue as to a material fact, the nonmoving party must come forward with evidence that would be sufficient to support a jury verdict in his favor”). IV. The Motion for Summary Judgment on Republication Grounds is Denied Maxwell has moved for summary judgment dismissing Giuffre’s complaint on the grounds that Maxwell is not liable for the republication of her Press Release by the media. Because as a matter of law the issuer of a press release is responsible for its publication, the motion is denied. In New York, liability for a republication “must be based on real authority to influence the final product.” Davis 54