DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p02006.png

Case 18-2868, Document 287, 08/09/2019, 2628251, Page58 of 76 by her express request. Gow’s testimony establishes Maxwell’s authority and control over the Press Release: Q. When you sent that email were you acting pursuant to Ms. Maxwell’s retention of your services? A. Yes, I was KKK Q. The subject line does have “FW” which to me indicates it’s a forward. Do you know where the rest of this email chain is? A. My understanding of this is: It was a holiday in the UK, but Mr. Barden was not necessarily accessible at some point in time, so this had been sent to him originally by Ms. Maxwell, and because he was unavailable, she forwarded it to me for immediate action. I therefore respond, “Okay, Ghislaine, I’1ll go with this.” It is my understanding that this is the agreed statement because the subject of the second one is “Urgent, this is the statement” so I take that as an instruction to send it out, as a positive command: “This is the statement.” Maxwell also cites Davis v. Costa-Gavras, involving a libel claim against an author who wrote a book about a military coup in Chile. 580 F. Supp. at 1085. Years after the author published the book, a third-party publishing house republished the book in paperback form and a third-party filmmaker released a movie based on the book. The book author did not actually participate in the republications, though he was aware of the 58